[June 24, 1970] In love with "Ishmael in Love" (July Fantasy and Science Fiction)

photo of a man with glasses and curly, long, brown hair, and a beard and mustache
by Gideon Marcus

Mazel tov!

This article is going to be short on news as the Marcus family has been occupied this past week.  The Journey has had its first inter-staff wedding!  The Young Traveler and Trek Correspondent Elijah broke the glass under the chupah on the 19th.  Sadly, the pictures aren't back from the Fotomat, so in lieu of that, here is a shot from my nephew David's wedding to Ada Argov in Israel from 1962.

Very blurry black-and-white photograph of a couple at their wedding. The bride is wearing a translucent veil and a slim, sleeveless, unadorned white dress. The groom is wearing a plain white shirt, black pants, and a conic hat.

The issue at hand

Between last-minute dress alterations and sifting through RSVPs, I managed to snatch time to read the stories of this month's Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction.  Unlike the marriage of Lorelei and Elijah, it is not a flawless affair, but it is also not without its charms.  Let's take a look:

Cover for The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction for July 1970. It announces stories by Isaac Asimov, Robert Silverberg, L. Sprague de Camp, Joanna Russ, Barry Malzberg, and Sterling Lanier. The cover illustration shows two men in long robes, one with a wizard hat and the other with a horned helmet. At the center of the illustration is a human face with mechanical eyes.
by Ronald Walotsky

Continue reading [June 24, 1970] In love with "Ishmael in Love" (July Fantasy and Science Fiction)

[June 22, 1970] We’ll All Go Together When We Go (Doctor Who: Inferno [Parts 5-7])


By Jessica Holmes

We last left the Doctor trapped on a parallel world, surrounded by fascists, monsters, and fascist monsters. Does the final serial of this year’s run go out in a blaze of glory, or does it all go up in smoke?

Welcome to the end… of Inferno.

The drilling facility with smoke billowing out and an eerie red glow.
This looks perfectly normal…

Continue reading [June 22, 1970] We’ll All Go Together When We Go (Doctor Who: Inferno [Parts 5-7])

[June 18th, 1970] A Case of Déjà Vu (Vision of Tomorrow #10)

Black & White Photo of writer of piece Kris Vyas-Mall
By Mx Kris Vyas-Myall

As I am writing this, voting in the UK General Election is taking place. However, we will have to wait until tomorrow for the results. As such, I want to address one of the biggest perpetual issues in Britain, the housing crisis.

It has become a kind of a dark joke over the last 50 years. At election time, every party leader will say how much they feel for the plight of the homeless and pledge to end the crisis. Then, as soon as voting is over, they will go back to ignoring the issue. Therefore, I feel, it is worth listing off the endemic problems causing this.

For a start, there is the obvious matter of money and organization. The UK spends a smaller share of GDP than the rest of Western Europe on housing and leaves decisions in the hands of local councils, which have a patchwork of plans. On top of that, housing building largely relies on the private sector who are more interested in high-priced luxury developments than on those for the poorest families.

Colour photo of the Ronan Point tower block, post-disaster where one corner has collapsed with ceilings hanging like loose tiles
Ronan Point, post-disaster

With this combination of political short-terminism, lack of investment and reliance on the private sector, it has led to a lot of poor-quality housing stock. An infamous example was the Ronan Point Disaster, where a gas explosion collapsed the corner of a tower block.

Black and White Advertisements for Homeless Charity Shelter.
On the Left is one with a knife. The text reads:
Sentenced the day he was born.
He was born in a crumbling tenement, grew up in a room his family shared with rats and cockroaches. With no hope of escapee.
He lived like a wild animal and was put away when he reacted like one.
Over a million people live in conditions that are breeding grounds for delinquency, mental and physical illness, illiteracy, broken marriages.
Shelter helps re-house  some of the most badly off, and fights to get something going for the others.
Our crying need is money. Give to shelter and you help give him a decent chance.
The advert on the right has a razor blade. The text says:
If Mrs. F. kills herself, it'll be third time lucky.
For Mrs. F. death would be a happy release from the stinking hole she and her family live in.
Twice she's tried suicide. To escape the stench, the damp, the flying insects, the peeling walls. At least a million people live in conditions that are breeding grounds that spawn mental and physical illness, crime, illiteracy, broken marriages.
Shelter helps rescue some of the worst-hit and campaigns vigorously to get something done for the rest. But it's a big job. It takes big money. Please give all you can.
Some of Shelter’s recent advertisements

With this lack of a political solution, it is unsurprising that several groups in the voluntary sector have been trying to fill the gap. The biggest of these is Shelter and, whilst all major parties praise their work, they seem to be getting sick of the situation. They are now withholding funds from local authorities that don’t help the poorest in their communities and running advertisements blaming the current biggest social ills on the housing crisis.

There are also other groups taking more direct action. Running in the election in London is a loose party grouping called “Homes Before Roads”, opposing the plans to try to deal with London’s congestion by building a series of ring roads through current residential districts. In a different way there is also the Squatters’ Movement, who are taking control of empty housing stock and trying to get official recognition for their use by those who cannot afford to go anywhere else.

However, I am not hopeful of even direct action resulting in a solution. Whether Wilson or Heath are Prime Minister next week, I suspect the situation will still be much the same in the mid-70s: homelessness and poor-quality housing are endemic; the political parties say what a scandal this is; make vague promises at a solution; promptly ignore it again.


I am also getting a sense of déjà vu from the latest issue of Vision of Tomorrow, with an expansion of articles on the history of SF and the writers retreading old ground:

Vision of Tomorrow #10

Painted Colour cover for Vision of Tomorrow #10 (July 1970). Cover illustrating Echoes of Armageddon by Lee Harding. It shows the close up of the face of a man of ambiguous ethnicity in an environmental suit looking scared. In front of him are two people in environmental suits running along a path way dodging laser fire from futuristic flying drones. Behind this all is shadowy ruined Earth.
Cover by Stanley Pitt

Continue reading [June 18th, 1970] A Case of Déjà Vu (Vision of Tomorrow #10)

[June 17, 1970] (June Galactoscope Part Two!)

BW photo of Jason Sacks. He's a white man, with short light hair, rectangular glasses, and headphones.

by Jason Sacks

Our Friends from Frolix 8, by Philip K. Dick

My favorite author, Philip K. Dick, has a new novel out this month. His previous novel, Ubik, was one of my favorite works by him. Ubik was an explosive look at reality and history and happiness and travel and so much more, one of his rich tapestry books which feels beguilingly simple until you pull back the layers and discover the complexity of the world Dick made.

Dick’s new novel is called Our Friends from Frolix 8. Frolix is not as good as Ubik or many of PKD’s other novels. In fact, Dick mentioned to the fan press that this book was a quickly-written attempt to raise cash in a hurry.

But Our Friends from Frolix 8 is not a bad novel, not at all.

Cover by John Schoenherr

As always, Dick centers his novel around a miserable male protagonist. Nick Appleton is a classic Dickian schlub. He works at the ignoble job of tire regroover, a job his dad had before him, and his grandfather before his dad. But Nick has dreams. No, not for himself. That would be futile in an uncaring world.

Nick has dreams for his son Bobby. As we meet Nick, teenage Bobby is taking the civil service exam in the chance to become an employee of the current Terran government. The government is run by the New Men, evolved superhumans with uncanny abilities to read minds, perform telekinesis, and perform other incredible skills. Bobby has some ability to read minds, so Nick has hopes…

…which are dashed by an uncaring bureaucracy and by the mediocrity of Bobby’s abilities.

In one of the more heartbreaking scenes in a Dick novel, two petty government bureaucrats don’t even bother to look at Bobby’s test scores because they simply don’t care about the boy. The Appletons are Under Men, ordinary people with no ability to advance at all in their society; consequently, there’s just no reason for the bureaucrats to care about this faceless family.

Nick gets more and more angry about Bobby’s fate, in a classic Dickian scene. We feel Appleton’s impotent fury as he literally rages against City Hall to his uncaring wife. As Nick leaves the house to try to figure out how he can help Bobby, Nick begins meeting people who are radicalized to oppose the structure of this impossible world. Through them, he begins to learn about Eric Cordon, leader of the resistance. He soon becomes involved with a group which plans to break Cordon out of government prison.

From there Frolix 8 spins in a few surprising Dickian directions: for one, we meet a council ruler who has the power of telepathy but hates his wife. For another, we spend time with the great Thors Provoni, a man who went into space to learn how to restore Old Men to power and returns to Earth ready to overturn everything that had happened prior to these events. And we witness revolutions and falls from grace and a whole lot of complex existential angst.

This is almost a great novel. Frolix 8 shows all the signs of having been written fast. There are several distracting continuity errors in the book, and this novel demonstrates how Dick often improvises his books rather than working from an outline. That aspect gives this novel the feeling of veering from one storyline to the next, seldom pausing to consider what happened or to give context.

But in its tale of a perversely arranged society, in its tale of a simple man whose smallest dreams are thwarted, in its wildly imaginative tale of Thors Provoni, this actually is a pretty good Dick novel. I found myself upset when Nick was upset, found myself raging mentally about his family's raw deal, and found myself grooving on the way PKD seems to pinball from one idea to the next, scarcely giving me the chance to catch my breath.

Even average Dick is pretty great.

4 stars.


A young white man with short hair wearing a navy P-coat, blue polo collar, and green t-shirt.
by Brian Collins

Until a couple years ago, I had no idea who D. G. Compton was. I don't keep up with the British writers as much as I ought to; you could consider it an unconscious tendency, sprouting from the Irish part of my heritage. But Compton has written about one novel a year over the past five years and one or two have fallen through the cracks. I have yet to read Synthajoy or Farewell, Earth's Bliss, but I do have his latest, The Steel Crocodile. This is a ponderous and only nominally SFnal novel, but these qualities are mostly to its advantage.

The Steel Crocodile, by D. G. Compton

Cover art by Diane and Leo Dillon.

Matthew and Abigail Oliver have hit a snag in their marriage, or rather a few related snags. Matthew is a sociology professor who takes a job working for the Colindale Institute, an international institute of scientists responsible for controlling (advancing as well as sometimes restricting) scientific discoveries in Britain and mainland Europe. The Colindale has come under fire from the CLC (Civil Liberties Committee) over ethical quandaries, including corruption within the institute. One of these CLC guys, Edmund Gryphon, was an old college buddy of Matthew's, and so Gryphon wants Matthew to find out what he can about the Colindale once he's inside. Mere hours after their meeting, police find Gryphon dead—apparently murdered with a laser weapon. The news is a shock to the Olivers, not least because Abigail used to have romantic feelings for Gryphon. Abigail herself is a devout Catholic while Matthew is basically an agnostic, the latter admitting that his faith in the God of Abraham is weak, and also filtered through his wife's genuine devotion. Without Abigail, Matthew would not believe in God.

We're met with a murder mystery in the first chapter, but it turns out that John Henderson, Matthew's predecessor at the Colindale, also died under suspicious circumstances. We have two deaths, as if we're in a detective novel—only there's no detective, no Sherlock Holmes or Philip Marlowe on the case. We do eventually get answers as to who or what killed these men, but Compton is far less interested in solving his own mystery than observing the slowly crumbling relationships of the characters involved in said mystery. The novel is structured such that we alternate between Matthew and Abigail's perspectives, from scene to scene, showing that despite their marriage appearing happy on the surface these are two very different people with different ideas as to what might be happening at the Colindale. Abigail's plot is complicated by her younger brother, Paul, being a wide-eyed revolutionary who has rejected both Matthew's company-man attitude and Abigail's Christian pacifism. These are characters with conflicting loyalties; in other words, they're a lot like real people.

I don't recall there being a given year for the events of the novel, but The Steel Crocodile could just as likely take place a decade from now as anywhen. Compton's near-future Britain is troubled—maybe only slightly more than the Britain of today. There is, of course, a big and very SFnal threat, in the form of the Bohn 507, a super-computer housed at Colindale headquarters. The Bohn is not akin to HAL 9000, but rather is shown to be little more than a tool for the Colindale's director and his dreams of producing what I guess I could describe as a surrogate for God. Ah yes, a computer thinking itself God, I'm sure we haven't heard that one before; but the same time, the point of the Bohn is not to develop a God complex but to provide what all the religion and ethics classes in the world could not. Much like how The Steel Crocodile is a detective novel without a detective, the world of the novel is undoubtedly a Christian one—only God is nowhere to be found. He seems to have gone out for lunch. This is a problem that disturbs Abigail, naturally, although despite SF's tendency towards atheism (or at least indifference at the idea of the Biblical God), Compton does not make light of Abigail's beliefs or taunt her for it. Abigail is indeed one of the best female characters I've read in an SF story as of late, by a considerable margin.

There is also, unfortunately, the sense that The Steel Crocodile does spin its wheels occasionally; at just over 250 pages it could have been trimmed here and there. There is also the sense, between all the internal monologuing (which there is a lot of) and the debates between characters, that Compton really wants his novel to be About Something; luckily for him, it is. We rarely get religiously serious SF novels (Walter M. Miller's A Canticle for Leibowitz, James Blish's A Case of Conscience and more recent Black Easter, plus a few others), but if Graham Greene were to write an SF novel (it's possible, but unlikely), it would look something like The Steel Crocodile. I would say, as someone who is not a Catholic or even a Christian, that this is a high point of praise.

Four stars.


A photo portrait of Winona Menezes. She is a woman with light-brown skin, long black curly hair and dark eyes. She is smiling at the camera.
by Winona Menezes

Time and Again, by Jack Finney


Jacket design by Vincent Ceci / Push Pin Studios

I know we’ve all read what feels like a million stories about time travel, but Jack Finney’s latest novel, Time and Again, strips the genre to its skeleton and assembles a different sort of story around it, one that presents a compellingly alternative way to tell a story driven by time travel. Si Morley, a sketch artist working in advertising in New York City, is jolted out of his respectably ordinary life by representatives from a top-secret government project. He has been determined to be the perfect specimen to test a truly surreal hypothesis: that if given enough training, and with a little push from hypnotic suggestion, it might be possible for a person to force themselves back to a specific point in time through willpower alone. To my surprise, this actually works, and Si finds himself trying to navigate the NYC of 1882 in order to solve a decades-old mystery.

Every author who uses NYC as a backdrop at least attempts to pin down a likeness of the city true to their own perceptions, and no good likeness is ever the same as another, but somehow they all feel accurate. I think it's endlessly fun to experience how yet another writer is going to bring to life such a multitudinous city, and here we get two! Finney produces a modern-day NYC that feels suffocatingly huge, a giant on the verge of collapsing under the weight of progress. By contrast, his 1882 NYC is a near-perfect tableau of glittering galas and horse-drawn carriages.

I am not the sort of person to be easily convinced to romanticize New York in the 1800s – the smallpox and smell of horse manure alone is enough to remind me how grateful I am to live in a more comfortable age. But Si has an artist’s eye, and Finney brings his perspective to life so vividly that I really felt like I was seeing this old world through him with no time to dwell on any annoying practicalities. The book is beautifully illustrated with Si’s sketches and photos, and the way he sees the old New York makes a perfectly romantic backdrop for a well-paced mystery.

Absurdly, the book chooses not to elaborate almost at all on the mechanism of time travel, audaciously rejecting the fancy machines and sciencey jargon of other works in the genre. When the explanations I was waiting for did not come, I realized that the story was asking a lot more of my imagination than I was used to. It almost feels too dignified to dirty its hands with pseudo-technical exposition, leaving more room to explore the philosophical and ethical concerns that crop up in the process of trying to engineer human history. If time travel were invented today, exciting as it would be, I do actually think I would be less concerned with how it was made possible and more worried about those with access to it running amok through the past trying to tweak things in their own image. At the very least, I hope that whoever gets to time travel first reads this book and fancies themselves a Si Morley.

Five stars; this one made a believer out of me.


[New to the Journey? Read this for a brief introduction!]


Follow on BlueSky

[June 16, 1970] Solaris, Year of the Quiet Sun…and a host of others (June 1970 Galactoscope #1)

This month saw such a bumper crop of books (and a bumper crop of Journey reviewers!) that we've split it in two. This first one covers two of the more exciting books to come out in some time, as well as the usual acceptables and mediocrities.  As Ted Sturgeon says: 90% of everything is crap.  But even if the books aren't all worth your time, the reviews always are!  Dive in, dear readers…

collage of six book covers described more thoroughly below

Continue reading [June 16, 1970] Solaris, Year of the Quiet Sun…and a host of others (June 1970 Galactoscope #1)

[June 14, 1970] Talkin' Loud, Swingin' Soft (June 1970 Watermelon Man, The Landlord, and Cotton Comes to Harlem)

Black and white photograph of a besuited and clean-shaven young Vietnamese man with dark, shoulder-length hair wearing glasses looking at something below the camera and grinning
by Tam Phan (Secret Asian Man)

There’s a volcano that’s ready to erupt on the silver screens, so prepare yourselves for a blast of truth, fury, and funk that has no patience for politeness. These three films, Watermelon Man, The Landlord, and Cotton Comes to Harlem, take a swing at the beast that is American racism as they stumble in their own strange ways trying to wrap their arms around it. These films attempt to not let their audiences off easy as they slap them across the face, daring white America to feel what it’s like to be on the wrong end of the stick. Whether you’re a white boy having your spiritual awakening in a Black neighborhood or a white man literally waking up Black, these films don’t just entertain. They challenge and provoke you with some honesty and a loud Black voice that is no longer asking to be heard.

Watermelon Man: A Punch That Lands… Mostly

Movie poster for with Watermelon Man, depicting a painting of a wedge of watermelon, stylized in palette to suggest the American flag, with a header reading'The Uppity Movie'

Sometimes a movie comes along that doesn’t ask for permission. It just barges in the front door and stares you in the face until you have no choice but to confront it. Watermelon Man is that kind of movie. Melvin Van Peebles throws a grenade into the laps of polite white America, and even when it is a bit of a dud, there is no denying that someone threw it. I was not sure if I was supposed to laugh, cry, or throw my slippers at the screen. Maybe all three. This movie does have guts, but it could have been better executed.

Jeff Gerber (played by Godfrey Cambridge, wearing whiteface so thick he looks like a walking toothpaste ad), a smug, self-satisfied, loud racist that thinks himself a “good guy”, wakes up one morning to find himself Black with no warning or explanation. The world predictably turns on him and suddenly all that privilege he wore like a second skin gets ripped clean off. He is left with the nightmare he has spent his entire life thinking only happens to other people. Insert a crash course in American racism here, delivered with the subtlety of a sledgehammer, but for some reason it works. It almost feels natural. The other shoe has dropped, and Van Peebles delivers without wasting any time easing you into anything.

Movie still of Jeff sitting at a busy and coffee-cup-strewn desk smiling and speaking on the telephone, cigarillo in hand
White before the fall.

Jeff’s life falls apart in a matter of days. He has a meltdown, his wife recoils from him, he is stopped on the streets by would-be citizens and the police, and his neighbors plot against him. It is brutal to watch. If I was supposed to laugh, it was not clear what I should be laughing at. His attempts to “whiten” himself using creams and spiritual solutions reminds me that for those of us not born with the golden ticket of whiteness – men like me, a Vietnamese immigrant who has seen the slant of every dirty look and been cowed by the title of being the “model minority” – this movie hits a nerve that is still raw. It is ultimately unsatisfying to see this happen to a white man because this is happening to a Black man and by proxy, all men who are not white.

Movie still showing Jeff seated with a drop-cloth draped over his shoulders and thick white paste slathered covering his head to the point of anonymity, sipping from a milk carton with a straw
White away your fears.

Watermelon Man is not perfect. It walks a strange line between cartoon and cautionary tale. Half of the time, it is all slapstick and Three Stooges, but when the ugliness shows up – the broken marriage and neighbors chasing him out – the movie whiffs on the gut punch. The movie wants to have it both ways and it is only funny if you’re meant to laugh at the clown without feeling sorry for him at the same time. Jeff’s resignation to his circumstances at the end is purely survival. He is not noble. He is not redeemed. He simply has no choice. There is nothing funny about that.

Peebles is angry, without a doubt. I can respect that. We need more Black men behind the camera screaming at America’s cruelties. I can understand the need to soften the blow with a bit of comedy, but this movie pulls its punches. Why are we quickly made to feel sympathy for a man who, just days before, would have gone out of his way to avoid shaking my hand? I suppose that I feel sorry for him because I understand him, but I wonder how it lands for those that do not. That is what concerns me. Maybe Watermelon Man intends to shock white folks awake without scaring them too much, but in doing so, it sells short the very fury it is supposed to be about.

I walked out of Watermelon Man with a mix of satisfaction and frustration. Satisfaction because it speaks a truth that a lot of folks would rather ignore. Frustration because part of me wanted it to cut deeper. Despite that, I appreciate this film. Van Peebles delivers a movie that nobody else in Hollywood would dare to make. In a time when the safe move is to stay quiet, Watermelon Man attempts to hit you with the truth. I just wish it was a truth that cut like a knife rather than a rubber chicken.

Picture of a young Black man with wearing a suit, ducking slightly and angled to the right, looking at the camera playfully, posed as though preparing to throw a punch with his right hand
What if we didn't pull our punches?

This movie needed to be made, and I am glad that it exists. It starts the conversation about an underlying condition in America that has been left undiagnosed for far too long. If this is where it begins, I can not fault it for being cautious. Despite being critical of this movie I think it is worth seeing if for no other reason than to see how easily skin color becomes a prison here in America.

3 out of 5 stars.


The Landlord: White Boy Woke Up

Movie poster for 'The Landlord', showing a close-up of a finger about to press the button for a doorbell, with the caption 'Watch the landlord get his'

It takes a certain kind of person to wake up one day and decide he wants to be deep. Not just rich or clever or free. He wants to be conscious. So, he runs away from home and thinks maybe if he tries hard enough, then he will be a better person. I watched The Landlord not expecting much, but it managed to get stuck in my mind long after it ended. It’s strange how a film from a country not your own can be an uncanny mirror. I, too, ran away from my home because I wanted to make a better life for myself. Of course, it was to escape a war-torn nation, but the feelings are the same. Stepping cluelessly into an unfamiliar culture should not be taken lightly.

Hal Ashby’s directorial debut is humorous, painful, and all too real. The film follows a rich white man named Elgar Enders (played by Beau Bridges) who buys an apartment block in a poor Black neighborhood in Brooklyn. He wants to renovate it, make it fancy for himself, and push out the tenants, but what he finds is they are proud, angry, funny, and most importantly, human. Of course, the tenants do not leave. This is where the real movie starts.

Movie still in which a clean-cut Elgar Enders, looking somewhat awkward but attempting to put on a social face, is caught in the act of introducing himself to a Black man and woman who flank him in the hallway
You don't see this every day.

Honestly, I didn’t hate Elgar. Is he clueless? Yes. Is he a tourist in the struggles of his tenants? Absolutely. But as the movie goes on, he does something that I have never seen a white character do in a story like this. He listens. He also sleeps with a Black tenant and knocks her up, but to his credit, he sticks around. This isn’t revolutionary, but it deserves some recognition. He has his human moments and that is what makes this movie feel real.

The beauty of this film is that it walks a tricky line, wanting to criticize Elgar and the entire rotten system that created him, but also to cheer his awakening. Sometimes it feels like watching a rich man go on a spiritual safari through Black suffering just to find himself, but we are quickly reminded that even white people get exiled when they go too far. He returns to his rich family and merely expresses empathy for his tenants and is met with cold disapproval and outright horror. No one is safe from being rejected. Not even family.

Close-up still of Elgar wearing an African printed top with a concerned and pensive look on his face with what appears to be a group of protesters carrying an American flag in the unfocused background
Dressed for a spiritual safari

It really hits home seeing the way Black and white America orbit each other in this movie. They are close enough to clash, yet never close enough to connect. As an immigrant, I recognize that tension. I have lived in those in-between spaces where I am too foreign for one side and invisible to the other. Lanie (played by the beautiful Marki Bey), the woman that Elgar falls in love with, is an attempt to bridge that gap. She is mixed race and light skinned enough to pass as white. Though their story is complicated and does not end in the usual romantic way, it feels honest. It doesn't pretend by forcing everyone to hold hands and sing at the end. It’s not entirely clear how this relationship moves forward, but I think that is also true of the relationship between Black and white America.

Picture of a Lanie smiling and in conversation, shot from over Elgar's shoulder
"You think I'm white don't you?"

The Landlord is not perfect. It tries to be funny and serious at the same time, and sometimes it stumbles. What is important is that it tries. It looks at race and class without pretending to have answers. It shows how people get hurt even when no one means to cause harm. It does not preach. It shows. It lets you feel. For me, that’s the best kind of art.

I walked away thinking this movie matters. Not because it solves anything, but because it refuses to look away. It points the camera at something that most people would rather turn a blind eye to or forget; that race and class in America are not just about violence and protests. They are about property, who owns it, who lives in it, and who gets thrown out. For all its flaws, The Landlord tries to have that conversation with humor and messiness. I think about my own future when I watch this movie. Maybe one day I will have a place here too. We all deserve to belong where we are.

4 out of 5 stars


Cotton Comes to Harlem: A Joke Without a Punchline

Movie poster for Cotton Comes to Harlem, featuring a stylized collage of drawing featuring scantily clad Black women and a pair of Black men with guns clustered around a golden automobile, with the silhouette of a bridge and cityscape in the background, with the caption 'Introducing Coffin Ed and Gravedigger, two detectives only a mother could love'

What was Cotton Comes to Harlem trying to do? All I got from it was confusion, noise, and a movie that couldn’t decide what it wanted to be. It was supposed to be a comedy. Maybe even a smart one. But the longer I watched, the more I felt like I was waiting for a punchline that never came.

The film follows two Harlem detectives, Gravedigger Jones (played by, again, Godfrey Cambridge) and Coffin Ed Johnson (played by Raymond St. Jacques), chasing down a bale of cotton that is hiding nearly $90,000 stolen from poor Black families by a conman preacher. Money that is scammed from the community with promises of a return to Africa. That setup could have led to something sharp and powerful: Black liberation, exploitation, identity, the hypocrisy of a hustler that uses language to empty people’s pockets. There is room here for satire, for anger, even for real laughs, but instead, the movie can’t decide what it is. Some parts play like gritty police drama. Others feel like something out of a cartoon. I kept asking myself, “is this supposed to be funny or am I missing something?”

Movie still of three well black men dressed in suits having an engaged conversation on the street
What is the narrative here? Crime featuring Black vs. Black?

Because this film plays like a buddy cop drama that got awkwardly spliced together with a Saturday morning cartoon. One minute there’s a serious conversation about exploitation; the next there’s a man dangling from a crane with his underwear showing. The music tells you it is a comedy, but the performances say otherwise. It’s hard to laugh when you don’t know if you’re supposed to.

The two main characters could have carried the film if they had more to work with. Gravedigger and Coffin Ed are supposed to be cool, no-nonsense detectives, but we barely learn anything about them beyond their toughness. I had to check the credits just to get their names. There is no emotional core here—just scattered scenes of fighting, chasing, and incomplete jokes.

I found myself trying to locate punchlines. To understand what was being critiqued and how, and what really frustrates me is how often the movie hints at something deeper. A scam built on the backs of Black hope? That could have been a powerful blow, but every time the movie touches something real, it pulls back and throws in a silly gag…that scarcely draws a chuckle. It’s as if it’s afraid to say anything poignant.

Picture of a quartet of Black men standing at alert and looking to their left, all wearing outfits suggestive of military uniforms
I don't think even they know what's going on here?

As an immigrant, I’ve seen how people get taken advantage of by slick talkers promising a better life. I understand how easy it is to be conned by flowery language and a plausible grift. It’s not so easy to say no to someone being polite when your culture raises you to respect your elders and authority. I recognize the hunger for dignity and how easy it is for someone to sell you a dream that turns into dust. I wanted this film to get to that. To deliver on that point. For someone to feel that. But it sends no clear message and as a result, it makes no point.

Movie still of a middle-aged black woman wearing a hat with lace & flowers looking dubiously on at whatever is taking place
You can't pull a fast one on me.

I’m not against mixing comedy and social commentary, but Cotton Comes to Harlem doesn’t mix them. It smashes them together and hopes something comes of it. For me, it didn’t work.  A good idea buried under a movie that never figures out how to tell the story… or the joke, I walked away more confused than entertained.

1 out of 5 stars.


In the end, Watermelon Man, The Landlord, and Cotton Comes to Harlem create a narrative around the same wound, one that digs into how race, power, and belonging shape life in America. Each of these films carve their own path because we need more diverse voices. Watermelon Man kicks and screams and demands to be heard, The Landlord softly asks questions using a white face in Black surroundings, and Cotton Comes to Harlem cracks jokes and hopes that the message lands somewhere amidst the laughter. They don't all succeed, but they do share the same desire to expose America to the absurdity and cruelty of American racism. Whether the message is delivered by satire, sincerity, or stumble, each film shares with us the same message: this story ain't over, and even if it sometimes tries to make you laugh, it sure as hell ain't funny.



[New to the Journey? Read this for a brief introduction!]


Follow on BlueSky

[June 12, 1970] Something Good! and Nothing Terrible (July 1970 Amazing)


by John Boston

The July Amazing is fronted by John Pederson, Jr.’s second cover, an agreeable Martian-ish scene, reminiscent of nothing so much as . . . Johnny Bruck on a good day.  So maybe the new commitment to domestic artists isn’t quite the boon I thought it was.  We’ll see.

Cover for Amazing magazine, July 1970. The illustration shows a small space colony on a desert planet. In the foreground, two men in astronaut suits ride a futuristic car. Text on the cover announces stories by Piers Anthony, Bob Shaw, and Robert Silverberg.
by John Pederson, Jr.

The non-fiction this month is a bit less gripping than usual.  White’s editorial recounts his unsatisfactory encounter with a woman who wanted to write an article about SF fandom, but apparently never did (or it never got published).  He then segues to a discussion of Dr. Frederic Wertham and his campaign against comic books which culminated in his book The Seduction of the Innocent.  Then, finally, to the point: Wertham is now saying he too will write about SF fandom and White doesn’t think it will be any good.  He’s probably right, but until we see what Wertham produces, discussing it is a little pointless. 

The letter column remains contentious but is getting a little repetitive; at this point it’s hard for anyone to say anything new about New Wave vs. Old Farts, and no more inviting topic has emerged.  The fanzine reviews are as usual, and the book reviews . . . are missing, damn it!  To my taste they have been about the liveliest part of the magazine.  I hope the lapse is momentary.

But speaking of SF fandom, I’ll take this lack of much to talk about as an occasion to mention something fairly striking about the magazine’s contents under Ted White’s editorship: there is an unusually large representation of Fans Turned Pro, authors who have—like White—been heavily involved in organized SF fandom.  This issue features Bob Shaw, a leading light of Irish fandom and heavy contributor to the celebrated fanzines Slant and Hyphen, who later won two Hugo Awards as best fanwriter among other distinctions; he also had a story in the second (7/69) White-edited issue.  Greg Benford (once a co-editor with White of the also-celebrated fanzine Void) has one of his co-authored “Science in Science Fiction” articles (the fifth) in this issue, and three stories to boot in White’s eight issues, as well as regular appearances in the book review column.  Robert Silverberg, who published a slightly earlier well-known fanzine Spaceship, supplied an impressive serial novel and has a story in this issue.  Terry Carr, another renowned fan editor, had a story in the last issue.  Alexei Panshin is not to my knowledge a fan publisher but has won the Best Fan Writer Hugo for his prolific contributions to others’ fanzines.  Harlan Ellison (short story in 9/69 issue) published the legendary Dimensions in the 1950s.  Joe L. Hensley (same) is a member of First Fandom and published a fanzine in the 1940s. 

And what does it all mean?  The floor is open for sober analysis and wild speculation.

Continue reading [June 12, 1970] Something Good! and Nothing Terrible (July 1970 Amazing)

[June 10, 1970] I will fear I Will Fear No Evil (July 1970 Galaxy)

photo of a man with glasses and curly, long, brown hair, and a beard and mustache
by Gideon Marcus

Tired of it all

Antiwar protesting isn't just for civilians anymore.

About 25 junior officers, mostly Navy personnel based in Washington, have formed the "Concerned Officers Movement".  Created in response to the growing disillusionment with the Indochina war, its purpose is (per the premiere issue of its newsletter) to "serve notice to the military and the nation that the officer corps is not part of the silent majority, that it is not going to let its thought be fashioned by the Pentagon."

Reportedly, C.O.M. came about because an officer participated as a marshal at the November 15, 1969 Moratorium anti-Vietnam War march, got featured in the Washington Post, and later received an unsatisfactory notation for loyalty in his fitness report.  The newsletter and movement are how other officers rallied in his support.

Copy of a Concerned Officers Movement newsletter dated April, 1970.

Because C.O.M. work is being done off duty and uses non-government materials, it is a completely lawful dissent.  According to Lt. j.g. Phil Lehman, one of the group's leaders, there has been no harassment from on high as yet.

We'll see how long this remains the case.

Really tired of it all

After reading this month's issue of Galaxy, I'm about ready to start my own Concerned Travelers Movement.  Truly, what a stinker.  Read on and see why:

Cover of July 1970's Galaxy Science Fiction, featuring a red cover depicting the bald head of a man held by electrodes floating in the background while a short haired woman stands in front. The cover depicts the titles,
'Robert A. Heinlein's
Latest and Greatest Novel
I WILL FEAR NO EVIL

THE ALL-AT ONCE-MAN
R.A. Lafferty

THE THROWBACKS
Robert Silverberg
cover by Jack Gaughan

Continue reading [June 10, 1970] I will fear I Will Fear No Evil (July 1970 Galaxy)

[June 8, 1970] Beneath the Planet of the… Mutants? (Not Apes)

BW photo of Jason Sacks. He's a white man, with short light hair, rectangular glasses, and headphones.
by Jason Sacks

Before you start reading this essay, let me warn you: I will be discussing major plot details from the latest Hollywood blockbuster, Beneath the Planet of the Apes. This will include the movie’s conclusion. For that matter, this article also ruins the ending of the original film. So be warned in case you haven't yet been to your local multiplex to see these in double-feature. On the other hand, you may well wish to go in with your eyes wide open… because Beneath the Planet of the Apes is both a fascinating continuation and a jaw-dropping pivot.

A color movie poster for Beneath the Planet of the Apes.  At the top in an orange block font is written, The bizarre world you met in Planet of the Apes was only the beginning.. What lies beneath may be the end! In the center are three images.  On the left, a military group of apes are in formation facing left, brandishing weapons and a pink and black striped flag.  They stand in front of a ruined building with obscured writing across the top, mostly buried in sand. At the center, the title Beneath the Planet of the Apes is written in yellow block capitals against a black rectangle. the left leg of the N in Beneath descends into an arrow pointing downward.  Beneath the title a circle is superimposed over the rectangle, in which there is an image of a man and woman wearing skimpy primitive clothing.  They appear to be stepping through the door of a building.  On the right, black text reads An army of civilized apes... A fortress of radiation-crazed super humans... Earth's final battle is about to begin -- Beneath the atomic rubble of what was once the city of New York! Beneath the text is a smaller picture of apes in military formation, perhaps an extension of the first picture but further away.

Continue reading [June 8, 1970] Beneath the Planet of the… Mutants? (Not Apes)

55 years ago: Science Fact and Fiction