[March 14, 1966] Random Numbers (May 1966 Worlds of Tomorrow)


by Victoria Silverwolf

Printers' Devils

When I'm reading a book or magazine, if I come across a mistake in printing it takes me right out of the story. If it's a simple misspelling, it's no big deal, yet there's still that brief moment when my mind unwillingly goes back to reality.

More serious problems, such as a few lines duplicated or in the wrong place, cause greater distress. In the most extreme cases, as when entire pages are missing, the experience is ruined.

I bring this up because my copy of the latest issue of Worlds of Tomorrow contains an egregious example of this kind of technical shortcoming.

Dig That Crazy, Mixed-Up 'Zine, Man


Cover art by Gray Morrow.

Allow me to provide you with a metaphorical road map for the route you need to take between the front and back covers of the publication.

Pages 1 through 15: OK so far.
Pages 18 through 21: Hey, what happened to the other two?
Pages 16 through 17: Oh, there they are.
Pages 22 through 45: Smooth sailing.
Pages 48 through 55: Here we go again!
Pages 46 through 47: Another two pages out of place.
Pages 56 through 164: No more detours, thank goodness.

If I've managed to annoy and confuse you with that, now you know how I felt when I read this issue. The short, sharp shock (to steal a phrase from Gilbert and Sullivan's The Mikado) of jumping from an incomplete sentence on page 15 or page 45 to a completely unrelated incomplete sentence on page 18 or page 48, then having to flip through the magazine to find page 16 or page 46, then having to hop back to page 15 or page 45 to remember what the incomplete sentence said, was a pain in the neck. (That's another allusion to the short, sharp shock. Ask your local G and S fan what it means.)

Thus, if I seem a little more critical than usual, blame it on the printer (not on the Bossa Nova.) With that in mind, let's get started.

The Ultra Man, by A. E. Van Vogt


Illustrations by Peter Lutjens.

I'll confess that I have a real blind spot when it comes to Van Vogt. I know he's one of the giants, like Asimov and Heinlein, of Astounding's Golden Age, but I almost always find his stuff hard going. Often I can't follow the plot at all. When I think I understand what's going on, it usually seems overly complicated. Given my prejudice, I'll try to be as objective as possible.

The setting is an international lunar base. A psychologist demonstrates his newly acquired psychic ability to a military type. It seems the headshrinker can tell what somebody is thinking by looking at his or her face. Suddenly, he spots an alien disguised as an African who intends to kill him.

(There's an odd explanation for why the alien takes the form of an African. Something about that would give him the protection of race tension. I have no idea what that's supposed to mean. That's my typical reaction to Van Vogt.)

We soon find out that other folks have been gaining psychic abilities, all of them following a very strange pattern. The people retain the power for a couple of days, then lose it for a while, then get it back in a much more powerful form for a brief time. If there was any sort of explanation for this bizarre phenomenon, I missed it.


Like the first illustration, this is more abstract than representative.

Anyway, the psychologist and the military guy get involved with a Soviet psychiatrist and with aliens intent on conquering humanity. Only the psychologist's intensified psychic powers, of a very mystical kind, save the day.

Science fiction is often accused of being a literature full of power fantasies, and this story could serve as Exhibit A. (Just look at the title.) The psychologist's abilities eventually become truly god-like.

I have to admit that this thing moves at an incredibly fast pace. It reads like a novel boiled down to a novelette. I can't call it boring, at least, even if it never really held together for me.

Two stars.

The Willy Ley Story, by Sam Moskowitz


Uncredited photograph.

The tireless historian of science fiction turns his attention to the noted rocket enthusiast, science writer, and SF fan. As usual for Moskowitz, there's a ton of detail, as well as a seemingly endless list of early publications by Ley and others. For an encyclopedia article, it would be a model of thoroughness. As a biographical sketch for the interested reader of Ley's writings, it's pretty dry stuff.

Two stars.

Spy Rampant on Brown Shield, by Perry Vreeland


Illustrations by Gray Morrow.

A writer completely unknown to me jumps on the James Bond bandwagon with this futuristic spy thriller.

It seems that the Cold War has been replaced by a struggle between the good old USA and some kind of unified Latin America. The enemy Browns — named for their uniforms, I believe, and not intended, I hope, as a reference to their ethnicity — have a shield that will protect them from nuclear weapons. This means that the dastardly fellows can attack the Norteamericanos with impunity.

The protagonist is the typical highly competent secret agent found in this kind of story, although said to be more cautious than others. He gets a cloak of invisibility so he can sneak into the office of the Brown scientist in charge of the shield and get the plans for it.


Our hero stuns his target.

The invisibility gizmo has several limitations. Dirt and moisture render it less than effective in hiding the user. (In an amusing touch, the hero has to keep changing his socks.) Some kind of scientific mumbo-jumbo is used to explain why it shimmers when more than one source of light, of particular intensities and locations, strike it.

Much of the story consists of the spy just waiting, so he can walk through a doorway, opened by somebody else, without drawing attention. In an interesting subplot, he has to fight altitude sickness as well, because the headquarters of the scientist are located at a great elevation, way up in the Andes.


Walking through the streets of La Paz, the highest capital city in the world.

The twist ending, during which we find out the true nature of the Browns' shield technology, is something of a letdown. It also allows the hero to escape from the Bad Guys, thanks to dumb luck and pseudoscience.

Two stars.

The Worlds That Were, by Keith Roberts

Here's a rare American appearance by a new but quite prolific British author. The narrator and his brother, from an early age, have been able to escape the slum in which they live and enter other times and places. He meets a woman in a dreary public park and brings her home. This leads to a battle with his brother, who sabotages the paradises into which he brings the woman, even trying to kill her. At the end, the narrator learns the truth about his brother and the power they share.

This is a delicate, emotional, poetic tale, full of vivid descriptions of both the beautiful and the ugly. Despite the speculative content, in essence it is a love story. Notably, the narrator, despite his incredible ability, is quite ordinary in most ways. Similarly, the woman isn't an alluring beauty or a temptress, but a fully believable, realistic character. This makes their romance even more meaningful.

Five stars.

Delivery Tube, by Joseph P. Martino


Illustrations by Jack Gaughan.

More proof of the continuing effect on popular culture of the late Ian Fleming, if any be needed, appears in yet another spy yarn. The setting is the fictional Republic of Micronesia. (Given the fact that we're told this is one of the most populous nations on Earth, which is hardly true for the many tiny islands collectively known as Micronesia, I'm guessing this is supposed to be something like Indonesia.)

Anyway, the supposedly neutral Micronesians, with help from Red China, possess atomic bombs and at least one satellite to send into orbit. The paradox is that they don't seem to have any way to launch either the bombs or the satellite. Our hero, with the help of some local opposition parties and anti-Communist Chinese, investigates the mysterious construction project happening on Micronesia's main island.


What are they building in there?

Along the way, he gets mixed up with an old enemy, a Soviet agent. The USSR wants to find out what Micronesia is up to as well, so the two foes become temporary allies. A lot of familiar spy stuff goes on. I'm pretty sure you'll figure out what the construction is all about long before the hero does.

Two stars.

Alien Arithmetic, by Robert M. W. Dixon

People who hate math can skip this part of my review.

The author considers various ways to record numbers, other than our familiar base ten Arabic numerals. Before he gets to the alien stuff, he talks about Roman numerals, and demonstrates how to perform addition with them. It makes you glad you don't use them in daily life.

After a brief discussion of binary arithmetic, familiar to many of us in this modern age of electronic computers, we get to some weirder ways of symbolizing numbers.

First comes an odd and confusing system in which the column on the right uses only 0 and 1, the one to the left of that 0, 1, and 2, the one to the left of that 0, 1, 2, and 3, and so forth. As an example, 4021 translates as (4x1x2x3x4) + (0x1x2x3) + (2x1x2) + (1×1) = (96) + (0) + (4) + (1) = 101. (The author claims it translates to 99, but I'm just following his exact method of calculation, using the same example and the same steps. Somebody doublecheck me, but I think I'm right! For 99, I think the number would be 4011.)

Next we turn to a way of recording numbers by combining symbols for their prime factors. This is easier to explain via the author's diagram than in words.


An example of number symbols based on prime factors. The symbol for six combines the symbols for two and three, and so forth.

These imaginary number systems seem awfully impractical to me. The author vaguely links them to imaginary aliens, but that's really irrelevant. My formal education in mathematics ended with first semester calculus, so I'm no expert, but this kind of thing interests me to some extent (which is why this part of the review is longer than it should be.)

Number-haters can start reading again.

Two stars.

Trees Like Torches, by C. C. MacApp


Illustrations by Jack Gaughan.

We jump right into a drastically changed far future Earth, so it takes a while to figure out what's going on. Many centuries before the story begins, aliens conquered the planet. It's considered an unimportant, backwater world, so they use it as a hunting preserve. (I'm assuming this includes humans as prey, although this isn't made explicit.) They also mutated Earth creatures into new forms, so the surviving humans have to face dangerous animals.

As if that weren't enough to ruin your day, there are also human renegades who kidnap children, for a purpose not revealed until the end. The plot deals with a man out to rescue his daughter from the renegades. Help comes from blue-skinned, telepathic human mutants.


Beware the trees!

A lot of stuff goes on besides what I've noted above. Despite the science fiction explanation for everything, this fast-paced adventure story felt like a fantasy epic to me. The beings in it seem more magical than biological. It's not a bad tale, if a little hard to get into.

Three stars.

Holy Quarrel, by Philip K. Dick


Illustrations by Dan Adkins.

Three government agents wake up a computer repairman. It seems that the super-computer that monitors all the data in the world for possible threats against the United States has a problem. It claims that it needs to launch nuclear weapons against a region of Northern California. The G-men managed to stop that by jamming a screwdriver into the machine's tapes.

The danger, or so it says, comes from a fellow who manufactures gumball machines.  This seems utterly ridiculous, of course, so the government guys want the repairman to figure out what's wrong with the computer. Just to be on the safe side, they investigate the gumball magnate, and study the candy machines as well as the stuff they contain. They communicate with the stubborn computer, even trying to convince it that it doesn't really exist.


You don't really think it will fall for that, do you?

You can tell that there's more than a touch of the absurd to the plot, along with a satiric edge.  The author throws in the computer's religious beliefs, as well as an outrageous ending.  The whole thing has the feeling of dark comedy.  (There are references to the USA having attacked both France and Israel, due to the computer's perception of threats.) Like a lot of works by this author, it has a plot that seems improvised.  It always held my interest, anyway.

Three stars.

In Need of Some Repair

So, were the works in this issue as messed up as the page numbers?  For the most part, I have to admit they were.  With the shining exception of an excellent story from Keith Roberts, both the fiction and articles were disappointing, although they got a little better near the end of the magazine.  My sources in the publishing world tell me that this will be the last bimonthly issue of Worlds of Tomorrow, and that it will turn into a quarterly.  This should give the editor, and the printer, time to deal with its problems.


Even an amusement park has to close down once in a while to fix things.



The Journey is once again up for a Best Fanzine Hugo nomination — and its founder is up for several other awards as well! If you've got a Worldcon membership, or if you just want to see what Gideon's done that's Hugo-worthy, please read his Hugo Eligibility article! Thank you for your continued support.




11 thoughts on “[March 14, 1966] Random Numbers (May 1966 Worlds of Tomorrow)”

  1. While none of the stories other than Roberts' intrigue, goodness this issue has some stunning interior art — especially Peter Lutjens whom I was unaware of. I think I enjoy SF interior art so much as they are restricted to solid black. And the feel often reminds me of woodcuts!

  2. I'm in full agreement with you on van Vogt. I often wonder if he's secretly peddling Dianetics at me and it makes me uneasy. This story just went on and on without moving forward.

    On the other hand, I liked the Ley bio more than you did. For Moskowitz, it was downright balanced and evenhanded with none of his usual hagiography. Mind you, he seems to have cribbed a lot of it from an article Willy himself wrote a few months ago.

    "Spy Rampant" had its moments, but they were few and far between. Another one that went on too long.

    The Roberts was good, though not quite 5 stars good for me. Still far and away the best story in the issue.

    "Delivery Tube" is another one that went on far too long (I'm sensing a theme). On top of having to go looking for the next page, I found myself frequently looking to see just how many more pages were in this and a few other stories. That's a bad sign.

    I didn't think much of the alien numbers article either. I quickly found myself skimming and generally ignoring the charts and tables.

    "Trees Like Torches" is a sequel, though nobody seems to have noticed. The first story was "Under the Gaddyl" (Worlds of Tomorrow, April 1964) and was decent if old-fashioned, much like this. I'd much rather see him write more of these than another Gree story.

    Though almost no one agrees with me, I've felt like Dick has been turning out mostly subpar work the last five or so years. But he seems to be getting back into form. I enjoyed this one more than almost anything he's written since the Journey came into being. One must ponder, though, the efficacy of teaching philosophy to what is essentially a weapon.

  3. Victoria S wrote: 'I’ve felt like Dick has been turning out mostly subpar work the last five or so years.'

    Not really. But his novels are now where all his energy is going and his money is coming from. As is evidenced by the near-absence of short stories from him in the early 1960s and now their relative infrequency next to his formerly profuse production and — as you suggest — their mostly throwaway, improvised quality.

    I do quite like the nuttiness of 'Holy Quarrel,' however.

    VS: "I’ll confess that I have a real blind spot when it comes to Van Vogt. I know he’s one of the giants, like Asimov and Heinlein, of Astounding‘s Golden Age, but I almost always find his stuff hard going. Often I can’t follow the plot at all. "

    That's because his plots were always ludicrous in terms of actual logic. As Damon Knight's classic demolition job 'Van Vogt – Cosmic Jerry-builder' accurately diagnoses.

    Simultaneously, Knight's criticism rather missed the whole _point_ of van Vogt in the classic era, which was that he was the original Wild Man of SF — an utterly unrestrained imagination operating on dream-logic.

    But his detour into dianetics and away from writing during the 1950s has cost him, in my opinion. He's lost that X factor. Now his stuff mostly just seems badly constructed and, alas, a little brain-damaged.

    1. A few years ago I described van Vogt as the Wile E. Coyote of science fiction–he ran off the cliff when he started out in 1939, then looked down in 1950, and was unable to muster the conviction to remain aloft thereafter.  As for his logic, or lack thereof, or different brand of, read or reread his old story "Asylum" and see if it doesn't remind you of some surrealistic paintings you have seen.

      1. "… the Wile E. Coyote of science fiction–he ran off the cliff when he started out in 1939, then looked down in 1950, and was unable to muster the conviction to remain aloft thereafter."

        Nicely put. If an apropos opportunity ever comes up, I'm going to steal that.

  4. Pardon my misattribution.

    That was DemetriosX who wrote: ‘I’ve felt like Dick has been turning out mostly subpar work the last five or so years.’

  5. van Vogt proved to be a good short story writer, but I always puzzled over his popularity as a novelist.
    Damon Knight sums up my thoughts in this review:

    THE WORLD OF NULL-A, by A. E. van Vogt
    Reviewed by Damon Knight
    "This widely-read novel began its career as a pretentious, foolish, wildly complicated and self-contradictory magazine serial.  In the hard-cover version, a ruthless pruning and trimming job is evident: whole sections of irrelevant material have been lifted out in toto, motivations and relationships have been patched into some kind of coherent shape, and many of the objectionable features of van Vogt's magazine style–the inversions, repetitions, overemphasis and mangled grammar–have been smoothed out.  All of these were encumbrances to the story's one virtue, its powerful, exciting movement.
    What emerges, then, is a fairly straightforward adventure story in a pseudoscientific background.  There is excitement in it, and if you do not examine the plot too carefully (a disadvantage of the present version is that this is now easier to do) you won't miss the vacant stages in the scaffolding. "

  6. Philip K.  Dick on A.E. Van Vogt's influence on him and THE WORLD OF NULL-A : "All the parts of that book did not add up; all the ingredients did not make a coherency. Now some people are put off by that. They think that's sloppy and wrong, but the thing that fascinated me so much was that this resembled reality more than anybody else's writing inside or outside science fiction."

    Granted, you might have to _be_ PKD to conclude that Van Vogt's writing more resembled reality than anybody else's.
    Still, another obvious acolyte of Van Vogt was Charles Harness in THE ROSE and THE PARADOX MEN — for those who've read those books — so Van Vogt in his prime was clearly onto something.

  7. To be fair, here's the whole PKD quote:

    "There was in van Vogt’s writing a mysterious quality, and this was especially true in The World of Null-A. All the parts of that book do not add up; all the ingredients did not make a coherency. Now some people are put off by that. They think it’s sloppy and wrong, but the thing that fascinated me so much was that this resembled reality more than anybody else’s writing inside or outside science fiction.

    "Damon Knight feels that it’s bad artistry when you build those funky universes where people fall through the floor. It’s like he’s viewing a story the way a building inspector would when he’s building your house. But reality is a mess, and yet it’s exciting. The basic thing is, how frightened are you of chaos? And how happy are you with order? Van Vogt influenced me so much because he made me appreciate a mysterious chaotic quality in the universe that is not to be feared. "

  8. What has happened to this once great magazine? Last year it was my favourite North American publication. This issue is just awful.

    I am a big fan of Van Vogt's work in the 40s but as soon as he discovered Dianetics he seemed to lose his touch. This hasn't changed my opinion that he hasn't written anything worth reading on his own since the final part of Voyage of the Space Beagle.

    Vreeland's piece felt like a badly written comic strip. I almost if it was only picked up off the slush pile because of a need to fill up the issue.

    Anyone that knows me here knows I have complicated views on Keith Roberts work. For me this was just pretty good, not amazing.

    Delivery Tube was just dull.

    Trees Like Torches was okay but forgettable.

    PKD is always worth reading, even with lesser efforts like this. Felt a bit more like Gordon Dickson's Computers Don't Argue, but much more interesting. Probably my favourite piece of the issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *