[March 18, 1963] The Missing Piece (April 1963 Fantasy and Science Fiction)


by Gideon Marcus

In prior articles, the latest news has headlined and set the stage for the SFnal reviews that followed.  This week, however, the news is all internal, filled with tidbits like

"YOUNG TRAVELER LEADS ACADEMIC LEAGUE TO DISTRICT CHAMPIONSHIPS!"

and

"FIVE YEARS OF R&D CULMINATES IN PRODUCT LAUNCH FOR TRAVELER-HELMED COMPANY!"

And yet, amongst the turmoil created by Mundac the Destroyer, we manage to continue the Journey — our most prized endeavor.  It helps that we now have a tremendous constellation of volunteer writers, allowing us to return to a every-other-day schedule for the first time in four years.  Still, I must do my part.

And so, amidst preparations for the Young Traveler's birthday party, I carved out time to read the April Fantasy and Science Fiction.  It is the inverse of last month's, which was forgettable or worse — until the last story.  This month's is surprisingly good… except for the last few stories.  A fair exchange, I think…

Fast Trip, by James White

Fritz Leiber recently wrote about how computers will soon be advanced enough to beat the best humans at chess in The 64-Square Madhouse.  Anne McCaffrey has written a tale of human brains cybernetically fused computers to control spaceships (The Ship Who Sang).  Now, returns my favorite SF-writing Ulsterian with his own spin on things.  In Fast Trip, we see what happens in a world where pilots are exclusively trained on their own spaceship, for whom swapping craft is as uncomfortable as swapping right-handed gloves with a fellow half your size… and with two left hands.  A good technical thriller.  Four stars.

Still Shall the Lovers, by Doris Pitkin Buck

A poem on how real stars shall always pale in brilliance to those in new lovers' eyes.  Three stars.

Place of Refuge, by Robert J. Tilley

A quick quality dip as Bristolian Tilley writes of the real world as if it be the nightmare, and vice versa.  Uninspired.  Two stars.

The Short and Happy Death of George Frumkin, by Gertrude Friedberg

A playwright, herself, Friedberg turns her hand to a Moderan-esque tale in which a nonagenarian playwright with an electric heart enjoys a brief flash of youthful energy when he's taken off batteries and plugged into the house line.  It's cute.  Three stars.

The Rigid Vacuum, by Isaac Asimov

There are few compound words I like better than "Luminiferous Ether," and fewer people I'd ask to explain this light-conveying substance than The Good Doctor Asimov.  Four stars for the first half of what looks to be a Two Parter.

Tell Me, Doctor – Please, by Kit Reed

Ms. Reed has recently moved and left no forwarding address, sadly terminating our burgeoning correspondence.  As a result, I have no authorial insight for this tale.  Nevertheless, Doctor is a strange and moving piece on dependence and torture as operatives of an evil state attempt to extract the secret of time travel from a bedridden exile from the future.  Difficult to read, and the ending is a strange Matryoshka that I'm still not sure I understood.  But like so much of Reed's stuff, it grips.  Four stars.

Kindergarten, by Fritz Leiber

A straightforward piece on learning the basic X-Y-Zs in a most unusual (and yet, the most commonplace) of settings.  Four stars.

The Voyage of the "Deborah Pratt", by Miriam Allen deFord

F&SF, more than any other SFF digest, is a haven for ghost stories.  This one, involving a 19th Century brig on the Gold Coast run, makes no great advances in plot.  Ah, but the telling, and the subject matter (far more horrific than the fantastic elements), are superb.  Five stars, and sure to be anthologized many times.

The Old Man of the Mountains, by Terry Carr

Over time, certain names in our genre incite a Pavlovian response in me.  For instance, Sheckley provokes a grin.  Garrett incites nausea.  Carr, a newish writer and long-time Big Name Fan, definitely brings about positive reactions, having now impressed me several times in rapid succession.  This pastoral piece, set in the mountains of Oregon, features the reunion of a country-turned-city boy, and the ornery cuss who knew his uncle many years before.  Like the deFord, the quality is in the telling.  Four stars.

My Son, the Physicist! by Isaac Asimov

Here's an inconsequential short-short from a fellow who has mostly abandoned science fiction.  I understand Asimov got a princely per-word sum for this piece, and it was used to adorn an advertisement for Hoffman Electronics in one of last year's Scientific Americans.  Three stars.

The World Must Never Know, by G. C. Edmondson

I really want to like Edmondson, a fellow San Diegan and one of the few non-Whites who has made it into the ranks of the SFF genre (he's Mexican).  But this latest in the series of stories set South of the Border, guest-starring a Mestizo who met an extraterrestrial policeman (to the former's profit, and the latter's dismay), is just too affected.  Two stars.

The Histronaut, by Paul Seabury

I didn't think I'd ever meet a time travel/alternate history story I didn't like, but Seabury managed to produce one.  One page of story preceded by many pages of dithering and nonsense.  And that single page isn't worth the wait.  One star.

Not Counting Bridges, by Robert L. Fish

Finally, a piece on the growing footprint of space devoted to the transit, maintenance, and storage of motor vehicles.  Two stars, careening toward one had it been longer than two pages.

That's a pretty sour note to leave a magazine that still scored a decent 3.2 stars on the Galacto-Meter.  If you stop before the Edmonson, I think you'll find your time thoroughly rewarded.

Speaking of which, I'm now off to jump on the giant trampoline we rented for the birthday party.  If I spot any X-15s on the way down, I'll be sure to snap a photo…




7 thoughts on “[March 18, 1963] The Missing Piece (April 1963 Fantasy and Science Fiction)”

  1. Our tastes do seem to be pretty compatible.

    I very much enjoyed the White. My only real problem was that I had a hard time fully accepting his McGuffin. There's also a bit of problem with the conclusion, since all the mass those men lost would still be on the ship, just no longer on the men. But it was still a very good yarn.

    "Place of Refuge" was pretty bad. I'm not even sure it merited a full two stars, but since you don't give out half stars, I guess it will have to do.

    Skipping ahead to where I can do more than sound my agreement, I found the Leiber not up to his usual standard. It left me rather cold, and the teacher seemed like a poor example of the sort of teacher he professed to be writing about.

    The de Ford and Carr were both fantastic. I did find myself wondering if Miss de Ford really did have that tale from her grandfather.

    The Asimov story was a triviality, but enjoyable. Those Hoffman ads turned out a few decent stories. I think I saw one or two of the others. Possibly one by Heinlein about a scout on the moon?

    The Edmondson was tedious. I might have liked it better had I recalled any of the other Mad Friend stories and thus been more interested in the characters. You know who could have turned this into a good story (on one of his better days)? Avram Davidson.

    The last two stories were so utterly forgettable that I actually couldn't remember what they were about. And I only finished the mag four or five days ago. I went and looked them up just before I started writing my letter here and I'm already having trouble remembering them again.

    In any case, any two of White, de Ford, Carr, and Reed are well worth the price by themselves. Alas, the last time we thought Davidson had righted the ship, he went careening off into weird things again. I look forward to the next issue with a bit of trepidation.

  2. The traveler mentions a story by Fritz Leiber, who "recently wrote about how computers will soon be advanced enough to beat the best humans at chess." 

    There are now several chess-playing computers. They are not very good at it; easily beaten by adequate chess players. But now that the ones and zeros of computers are switching from being based on vacuum tubes to being made from the new, much faster, transistor, perhaps a computer will have a chance against a human player. Skill also depends on how the program is interpreted by the computer.
    So we will see – chess is one measure of "intelligence" in a computer. So far the computers fail in "common sense." I wonder what the future will bring?

  3. General agreement about this issue.  Maybe I liked the White a bit less than you did, but it wasn't bad.  Most of the other stories were minor.  The deFord was definitely the jewel of the issue, and the Reed was haunting and mysterious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *