[May 8, 1964] Rough Patch (June 1964 Galaxy)


by Gideon Marcus

I think I've got a bad case of sibling rivalry.  When Victoria Silverwolf came onto the Journey, she took on the task of reviewing Fantastic, a magazine that was just pulling itself out of the doldrums.  My bailiwick consisted of Analog, Fantasy and Science Fiction, IF, and Galaxy, which constituted The Best that SF had to offer.

Ah for those halcyon days.  Now Fantastic is showcasing fabulous Leiber, Moorcock, and Le Guin.  Moreover, Vic has added the superlative Worlds of Tomorrow to her beat.  What have I got?  Analog is drab and dry, Avram Davidson has careened F&SF to the ground, IF is inconsistent, and Galaxy…ah, my poor, once beloved Galaxy

The Issue at Hand


cover by McKenna

To Build a World, by Poul Anderson


by Morrow

Wham!  Kaboom!  A giant drilling machine is sabotaged while releasing the gasses pent up under the Moon's surface.  A man dies, and the lunar terraforming project is thrown into jeopardy.  It is up to the drill team's foreman, Venusian Don Sevigny, to go to Earth and sniff out the plot…before his life is snuffed out!

Sixty pages of stilted exposition punctuated by standard action scenes ensue.  Moreover, overcrowded Earth has exactly one woman on it (at least that we ever see), and though she turns out to be a villain, she's far too good-looking to remain one.  Sigh.

Poul Anderson vacillates between brilliance and boredom, and To Build a World is a swing of the pendulum hard toward the latter extreme. 

Let's hope the thing doesn't get stuck there.  Two stars.

The King of the Beasts, by Philip José Farmer

Twenty years ago, this utterly predictable vignette might have made acceptable filler in Astounding.  Here and now, it's an embarrassing waste of space.

One star.

The Man from Earth, by Gordon R. Dickson


by Giunta

On the crossroads planet of Duhnbar, the Samarkand of the stars, a visiting human trader fails to observe a minor religious rite.  Duhnbar's all-powerful Director decides to make an example of the man, imposing a long-lapsed death penalty.  In a futile act of defiance, the man preserves his pride, if not his life.

This is a nicely written piece, and the setup is genuinely interesting, but the ending is a let down.  Three stars.

The Well-Trained Heroes, by Arthur Sellings


by Jack Gaughan (and not one of his best)

People often have the misapprehension that colonization reduced population pressure.  It doesn't; it increases it.  Colonies always fill up.  Passage is expensive.  Inevitably, home remains as crowded as ever, but the folks living there are all the more disgruntled for being stuck there.

In Heroes, Earth's citizens yearn to go to space, but barely one in a million make the cut to join the astronaut corps.  Tension builds, and town after town goes into unrest.  It is up to a pair of astronauts to defuse would-be rioters by convincing them that space isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

Kind of a neat story, if a little meandering.  Three stars.

For Your Information: Anyone Else for Space?, by Willy Ley

After months of desultory articles, Willy Ley is back in form.  This month's column is nearly twice as long as it has been recently, and it's chock full of the latest news on rocket development outside the Big Two.  Having been to Japan's nascent launch facilities recently, it was exciting to hear about their latest developments (as well as those of the Europeans, the Israelis, the Egyptians, and the Indians!)

Five stars

Collector's Fever, by Roger Zelazny

Rock collecting is a fine hobby, provided the specimens aren't sentient and ready to deeble!  A slight, amusing piece that gets extra points for being told almost entirely in dialogue.

Three stars.

The Many Dooms, by Harry Harrison


by Nodel

On expeditions to hostile worlds, there is no margin of error.  When a cocky geologist's sloppiness threatens the lives of his crew-mates, fate (perhaps with a little push from human hands) deals with the problem.

I liked the writing on this one, and the subject matter is up my alley, but I found the ending both too straightforward and, quite frankly, disturbing.

Three stars.

An Ancient Madness, by Damon Knight


by John Giunta

On an island where breeding is artificial and strictly regimented, and romantic pairings are unheard of, one sixteen year old girl longs for a dramatic love.

A lot.  Loudly and repeatedly.  For twenty angst-infused, plot-stationary pages.  Then, in the final two paragraphs, she runs off with the Doctor to live happily ever after.

I'm not sure why this story was written.  I'm even less certain how I made it through the thing.

Two stars.

Men of Good Will, by Ben Bova and Myron R. Lewis

In the near future, the Cold War has spread to near-Earth space, occasionally sparking into moments of heat.  For some reason, however, the Moon seems to be a zone of armistice.  The Norwegian UN ambassador heads to the Earth's companion to find out the secret.

The secret (read no further if you wish to remain unspoilt): The Yanks and the Ruskies did shoot it out — once.  Those bullets achieved orbital velocity, and every 27 days, their orbit intersects with the bases, peppering them with new holes.  It's simply too dangerous to keep up the fight.

It's a cute premise, but of course, it makes absolutely no sense.  The periapsis of the bullets only intersects with the bases once out of 24 x 27 orbits; the rest of the time, the bullets should be hitting lunar hills.  They should have been stopped after the first grounding.

C'mon, Ben!  You're a science writer fer cryin' out loud.  Two stars.

The Sincerest Form, by J. W. Groves


by Cowles

Last up, we have a tale told from the point of view of imitative aliens, spore-like things that have no consciousnesses of their own, but which can become replicas of the beings they devour.  The process is imperfect, and the thought processes get a bit garbled.  In fact, it takes a while for the reader to figure out what's going on; it is only when the imitators encounter bonafide humans that things become clear.

I have to give Groves credit for an interesting concept, but the very trickiness of the idea meant that proper execution lay slightly beyond the author's ability.  Still, if he doesn't quite stick the landing, Groves does leave you with something to think about.

Three stars.

Summing Up

So, on the one hand, I am left grousing at my fate, stuck with a 2.7 star issue while Vic reviews the good stuff.  On the other hand, I'm not John Boston, resigned to review bottom-of-the-pack Amazing every month.  Plus, is that a new issue of Gamma I see peeking out from under the stack of bills?

I suppose I do have blessings to count!


[Come join us at Portal 55, Galactic Journey's real-time lounge!  Talk about your favorite SFF, chat with the Traveler and co., relax, sit a spell…]




10 thoughts on “[May 8, 1964] Rough Patch (June 1964 Galaxy)”

  1. Well, I haven't read the Anderson yet, and once again I'm not entirely sure if I will. I suppose I'll at least give it a try.

    "King of the Beasts" was just awful. And really, really predictable. Farmer didn't even almost get it right this time. Almost always almost gets it right? Too confusing.

    The Dickson was pretty good. The ending was depressing, but there's room for sad stories, too. I liked it.

    "Heroes" was also fairly interesting. Your assessment of "a little meandering" is spot on. Good story, though.

    Ley's science article is where we split. It's right in your bailiwick. I found it less than interesting, actually. The space race excites me, but the nuts and bolts often leaves me cold.

    Zelazny swings back. An enjoyable story, if slightly predictable. Science fiction seems to have more than its fair share slightly shady nephews with rich uncles.

    The Harrison is another disturbing one. (Rather a lot of those stories in this issue.) Very well written and thought-provoking. I like Harrison in this mode.

    The Knight was, as noted, pointless. The world he created is interesting. Pity he couldn't come up with something interesting to do with it.

    I spotted the major problem with the Bova story, too. Even if those bullets don't hit any lunar features, every impact with the structure of the station is going to slow them down and change their trajectory.

    I'm not sure I liked the Groves quite as well as you did. He definitely missed the mark. I'd probably come in under three stars, but round up.

    And not to rub salt in the wound, but there have been occasions of late where Amazing has done better than F&SF. Of course, the best story of the year was in F&SF, but you didn't like it. If it's any consolation, this month's issue might be better (based on one story, anyway).

    1. Well, I got around to the Anderson. It was better than you made it out to be. Not great, he's capable of much better, but not as bad as the stuff he was churning out a few years ago. Not even as bad as that "Three Worlds" thing a few months ago. That said, it definitely would have been improved by being longer. Novel length would have given him room to develop a few things better and to let things happen more naturally.

  2. Pathetically awful illustrations, too, with the exception of the Morrow up top for the Anderson story. Even the cover is amateurish.

    Come on, Fred.

  3. This is a comment about one of the entries following the Galaxy review.

    I doubt that William Tenn should be considered a British author.  He was born in London, but I believe that he has lived in the United States since he was only a year or two old.

  4. With no serialized novel to skip, this is a lot of reading.  Might as well get started on it, bit by bit.  Easy part first: the three short-short stories.

    "The King of the Beasts" — Obvious, indeed, but I didn't hate it.

    "Collector's Fever" — Just clowning around, but with a certain charm.

    "Men of Good Will" — I won't dispute the technical flaws, but it makes its satiric point well enough.

  5. Two short stories:

    "The Man From Earth" — Quite interesting, with all the exotic details.  The Director was a fascinating creation.  The "better death than slavery" theme may not be new, but it was nicely done.

    "The Many Dooms" — Unusually realistic for an interstellar exploration story.  The grim plot had a sense of inevitability to it.

  6. A couple of the novelettes:

    "The Well-Trained Heroes" was intriguingly different and ironic.  I'm glad to see the point made that space travel is not going to be for the masses.

    I seemed to have liked "An Ancient Madness" quite a bit more than others.  Yes, the plot is very simple; but it was beautifully written, and the setting was extraordinarily imaginative.

  7. The last novelette:

    "The Sincerest Form" held my interest for the sheer weirdness of the premise.  Other than that, there wasn't much to it.

  8. And finishing up with the novella:

    "To Build a World" started off in typical vivid, dramatic Anderson fashion, got pretty talky, with lots of exposition, then turned into a typical spy/chase/action-adventure yarn.  I liked the squirrel-creature — it provided the most emotional scene — but thought the Martians weren't necessary.  So, fair-to-middling stuff overall.

  9. Gideon, why can't you and Victoria write full reviews of the same magazines? I don't mind reading two POVs. I'm glad she added her comments here, but I would have liked to have heard more of what she thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *