[March 8, 1965] An Alien Perspective (April 1965 Galaxy)


by Gideon Marcus

Understanding the Other

Civilization is about building a society out of disparate units.  It has to go beyond the family and clan.  The key to organizing a civilization is empathy, recognizing that we are all different yet we share common values and rights.  Once we understand each other, even if we don't agree on everything, then we can truly create "from many, one."

Science fiction allows the exploration of cutting edge sociological subjects, one of them being the understanding of the "other".  That's because the genre has a ready-made stand-in for the concept: the alien.  Indeed, many science fiction stories are allegorical; they address colonialism, the Cold War, societal taboos, in ways that might currently be too touchy or on-the-nose for conventional fiction.  We can hope that, with the bottle uncorked, less allegorical stories will be required in the future. 

Of all the science fiction magazines that come out every month, I think Fred Pohl's trio of Galaxy, IF, and Worlds of Tomorrow has the strongest tradition of incorporating aliens (Analog also has aliens, but thanks to its editor's sensibilities, they are almost invariably both more evil and inferior to human beings; Campbell likes a certain kind of allegory…)

Meeting the Minds


by George Schelling (it says it illustates War Against the Yukks, but it doesn't)

This month's Galaxy is a case in point, with six of its nine tales involving aliens of one kind or another.  There's some good stuff in here, as well as a number of slog stories.  Let's look, shall we?

Committee of the Whole, by Frank Herbert


by Nodel

Watch your step — there's a rough patch right at the start. 

Whole is a meandering preach piece about an inventor who appears before a Congressional committee with news of a new, revolutionary invention.  I'll just tell you about it because the first two thirds of the story are less suspenseful than obtusely annoying: it's a ray gun.  Its applications are infinite, but the one most of the Congressmen are worried about is that every owner has a weapon more powerful than the atom bomb at their disposal.  And, because of the way the invention has been disseminated, everyone in the world has access to them.

The result, the inventor opines, is going to be a world of true libertarian equality.  "An armed society is a polite society" is how the expression goes.  It's the kind of naive sentiment that would go over well at Analog, but for adults, it's just ridiculous.  In equalizing humanity through armed neutrality, the inventor has made aliens of us all.  I'll wager that Earth's population of humans will be dead inside a week…and probably most of the animals. 

One star, and yet more disdain for the Herbert byline.

Wrong-Way Street, by Larry Niven

Ah, but then our fortunes truly turn around.  Wrong Way Street gives us the unplanned adventure of Mike Capoferri, a scientist stationed on the Moon late this century to investigate an alien base and space ship.  They have lain on the lunar plain for countless millions of years, and their provenance and function are completely unknown.  That is, until Mike unwittingly not only discerns the motive force for the space ship, but also activates it.  Here, understanding the alien way of thinking proved hazardous to Mike's health.  Can he get home?  Will the human race survive his journey?

This is author Niven's third story, and he continues with the same deftness he displayed with his recent short novel, World of Ptavvs.  I guarantee that the ending of Street will stay with you.

Four stars.

Death and Birth of the Angakok, by Hayden Howard


by Jack Gaughan

Peterluk is a young Eskimo out hunting when a horrifying bunch of one-eyed Seal People arrive.  He panics and entreats his powerful Grandfather, holed up in Peterluk's igloo, to aid him with his mystical powers.  But Grandfather is too weak to assist and, in the end, Peterluk is left to defeat one of the aliens with a conventional rifle.

When the Seal People ship surfaces from beneath the ice, much to Peterluk's surprise, it disgorges not aliens but white people in uniform.  And Peterluk begins to doubt the power, and even the human nature, of his strangely humped, ever demanding Grandfather.

Confusing at first, Angakok is actually a pretty neat tale of two types of aliens (human and truly extraterrestrial) as seen from the point of view of one completely naive to other cultures.  While the bones of the plot are fairly conventional, I appreciated the novel viewpoint.

Three stars.

Symbolically Speaking, by Willy Ley

Any meeting of the minds between human and alien will require a common symbology to convey ideas.  A science fiction writer looking for inspiration for such a symbol set could do worse than to read Willy Ley's latest science article for Galaxy, in which he discusses the evolution of symbols for the planets, alchemical substances, numbers, etc.

Fairly dry, but there's interesting information here.  Three stars.

A Wobble in Wockii Futures, by Gordon R. Dickson


by Gray Morrow, channeling Bill Gaines

Tom and Lucy Reasoner are a recurring pair in a series of stories, this being the fourth.  Sort of a "Nick and Nora" meets Retief, the stories of the Reasoners began charmingly enough, with Tom an interstellar diplomat with a mystery to solve, and Lucy his sometimes discerning assistant.

Last time around, Tom had not only gotten inducted into the interstellar assassin's guild, but he'd also catapulted Earth onto the galactic scene, dramatically increasing his home planet's clout.  Now the humans have gotten themselves hip-deep in a planetary investment that made turn out to be completely worthless.  Tom must find out who hoodwinked the Terrans and why before humanity is bankrupted.

This installation has the same problem as the last one — Lucy is sidelined and played for stupid, and the humor of the tale just isn't funny.  Dickson can, and usually does, do better.

Two stars.

Wasted on the Young, by John Brunner

The concept of the "teenager" is a fairly recent one.  It used to be that kids enjoyed a relatively short childhood before transitioning to the labor force and/or marriage.  Now there is an intermediate phase before adulthood during which a youngster can learn the ropes of grown-up society.

Brunner's latest story posits an even longer period of immaturity, one in which kids are given free credit until age thirty to do whatever they want.  The catch: once they reach their fourth decade, they have to pay back what they've spent by being productive members of society.  Thus, the wastrels find themselves indebted indefinitely, while those who lived a spartan life get to be free agents.

Hal Page, age 32, believes he knows a way to cheat the system…but in the end, society has use for people who have spent it all, even their life.

There's a great idea here, but I feel it was somewhat wasted on the gimmick (and not particularly logical) ending.  Still, three stars.

The Decision Makers, by Joseph Green


by Jack Gaughan

Allan Odegaard is a Practical Philosopher, a kind of emissary for humanity to other worlds.  His job is to judge whether a planet is inhabited by intelligent life or not; if so, Terran policy is to keep hands off.  As one would expect, such a determination is often strongly opposed by financial interests.

Capella G Eight is an ocean planet, though during times of Ice Age, three continents emerge from the sea as the water level drops.  Its dominant life form is a seal-like creature.  Though it possesses a relatively tiny brain pan, somehow it lives in a communal society and can use tools.  Is it intelligent?  Does the fact that these creatures live near a rich uranium deposit factor into Odegaard's decision?

We've seen this kind of story before — H. Beam Piper's Fuzzy series is probably the purest example, though J.F. Bone's The Lani People should also be noted.  It's a worthy subject, and Green does a pretty good job, though the ending is abrupt and not quite as momentous as I would have liked.

All in all, it's the best story I've seen from Green in an American publication (he tends to stick to the English side of the Atlantic.) Three stars.

Slow Tuesday Night, by R. A. Lafferty

We're back to Earth for this one.  We all know that the pace of life has only quickened over the generations.  Lafferty, whose middle name would be "whimsy" if the initial were a W. and not an A., writes of a future society in which society is speeded up a hundred-fold compared to now.  Fortunes are made and lost in minutes.  Marriages last an hour on a good night.  And a lifetime can be lived in a week.

It's cute, but the satire wears thin about halfway through.  Also, there are only two female characters, and their sole goal appears to be competing for the earliest wedding of the evening.

A low three, I guess.

Sculptor, by C. C. MacApp

Eight years ago, a disgraced spaceman abandoned his crewmates on an alien world, rushing home with a set of invaluable statues — and a hole in his memory about the affair.  Now he has been shanghaied by a criminal bent on returning to this world and plundering it for more of the exquisite figurines.

What race made these wrought-diamond minatures?  And why does the amnesiac spaceman feel such dread on the planet's surface?

This is another "they looked like us" yarn that has been around since Campbell kick-started the genre with Who Goes There (and Heinlein made it popular with The Puppet Masters).  It's so prevalent, in fact, that there's another example of it in this very issue! (Angakok) Despite not really treading on new ground, it may well be the best work I've seen from C. C. MacApp, a fairly recent author who never fails to never quite succeed.

Three stars.

War Against the Yukks, by Keith Laumer


by Gray Morrow

Six years ago, the Journey had the (dubious) pleasure of reviewing Missile to the Moon.  It was one of a long line of movies involving a man-less society, run by a bunch of sex-starved female beauties just waiting for a hunk to tip the order on its ear.

Laumer's latest is the same old story: this time, the men are an anthropologist and his stereotypically British assistant, who are whisked to Callisto where they encounter the last remnants of an ante-diluvian war between the sexes.  High Jinks ensue(s?)

Only the author's puissance at writing elevates this story above the level of dreck.  Even then, it's a disappointment.  I understand that satirizing a hoary cliche can be fun, but the whole point of Galaxy is that the magazine doesn't even acknowledge the existence of said cliches, much less indulge in them.

It really deserves two stars.  I'll probably give it three anyway.

Summit's End

This month's Galaxy was as alien-heavy as usual, and there was a broad variety of stories.  On the other hand, with the exception of the Niven, there were no stand-outs.  Indeed, the issue read more like an overlong issue of IF (which has also dipped in quality) than Galaxy of old.

Nevertheless, Ad Astra per Aspera.  What goes down must come up again, and when humanity finally does meet the alien denizens of the stars, should they exist, our starship crews will doubtless have been inculcated with the lessons learned in SF, particularly in magazines like Galaxy.






9 thoughts on “[March 8, 1965] An Alien Perspective (April 1965 Galaxy)”

  1. I have a different view of the Lafferty.  To me, Slow Tuesday Night is a masterpiece – 5 stars.

  2. I feel the same as do the other gentlemen above me about the Lafferty — 4 or 5 stars.

    On the other hand, you're right about the Herbert story, "Committee of the Whole,'" which is definitely a dull-minded slog.

    It particularly suffers by comparison to an old Algis Budrys story called "The Burning World," which was in Larry Shaw's INFINITY in July 1957 and which considers essentially the same notion: an ultimately democratizing weapon/power source .

    But Mr. Budrys set his story in the aftermath of the emergence of such a weapon — in what seemed a European, post-totalitarian setting — and it had a rather more realistic picture of the sort of socio-politics that might emerge in in such a world.

    The Niven is fun.  Let's hope we see more from this promising young author.

  3. Don't forget the jaunting Gully Foyle tossing out the very dangerous PYRE to crowds at the end of Stars My Destination (1957.)) Even at the age of 17 I didnt believe that would work out too well.

  4. I didn't think "Committee of the Whole" was quite that bad, although it's not particularly good.  All talk, but I think the conclusion isn't quite so one-sided as you suggest.  The possibility of total destruction still exists with a universal super-weapon.  (The problem with this "mature or die" scenario, of course, is that it takes only one person to mess things up permanently.)

    "Wrong-Way Street" was interesting.  Niven sure likes huge concepts.  He just needs to polish his style a bit and he'll be a real winner.

    "Death and Birth of the Angakok" was very intriguing.  I wasn't sure I understood everything, but that sort of added to the power of it.  I felt as bewildered as the protagonist at times.  That may have been the intent.

    "A Wobble in Wockii Futures" was too silly for me.  Besides that, whenever the hero needs to know something, his "other senses" (or whatever they are) help him out.

    "Wasted on the Young" was very good, I thought.  Classic Galaxy-style social speculation/satire, with a powerful ending.

    "The Decision Makers" wasn't bad.  The humans sure need to get hit on the head with the intelligence of the aliens, though.

    "Slow Tuesday Night" is pure Lafferty.  Utterly mad, but somehow he carries you away with it.  Only he can getg away with giving his characters absurd names, for some reason I can't put my finger on.

    "Sculptor" had an intriguing premise at first, but kind of fizzled out as it became a typical chase story.

    "War Against the Yukks" had its moments, but it was silly at times, too.  A so-so mildly dirty joke.

  5. The Herbert was slow and overly talky, dry, smug and all those other things wrong with it. I'd still give it two stars for raising an interesting problem. But as Victoria notes, it only takes one person in a situation like this to upset the apple cart for everyone.

    The Niven was interesting. His characterization still needs some work, I think. Not sure I could go all the was to four stars, but it's a very solid three. Definitely looking forward to more from this new author. In pretty short order, he's given us three very different stories, all good.

    "Angakok" was very interesting. For quite a while, I thought we were looking at an alien society on another planet. It might have been a little long, but that may stem from the style of Eskimo storytelling the author may have been emulating.

    Willy Ley's article may have been a bit dry, but that's really just his usual style. The biggest problem in the article wasn't even his fault. It would have been nice to have the tables under discussion a lot closer to the paragraphs talking about them, rather than 3 or 4 pages earlier. The subject matter was almost Asimovian, though the Good Doctor would have taken at least three different articles to cover this much ground.

    You're dead on about the Dickson. I think it's also true that the last couple of entries in this series have drifted to more serious than silly, which hurts them. However, the fact that you can say "Dickson can, and usually does, do better" shows how much he's improved in the last few years. When I first started reading the Journey, you went into a Dickson story expecting not to like it. He might have stood a little ahead of Randy Garrett in your estimation, but not much. Look what writing for somebody other than Campbell can do for an author.

    I'm with you on the Brunner. He took a potentially good concept and didn't quite make it work. I'm reminded of a recent story about young thrillseekers and a girl who climbs into the rocket nozzle of a ship on the Moon-Earth run. Do all our science fiction authors have such a poor view of young people today?

    I'm also really with you on the Lafferty, though I liked it a little better than you did. Once in this letter column, I described Lafferty as being like Avram Davidson and Ted Sturgeon smoking opium and collaborating on a story. I stand by that, though I think it might have been some of Dr. Leary's LSD, rather than opium.

    "Sculptor" shows that MacApp actually can write decent stuff. This was miles better than that awful Gree stuff he's been churning out.

    I like Keith Laumer. He's probably one of my favorite authors right now. This was just awful. The tone, in particular, was all over the place. Usually, it was far too serious for the subject matter. It's as though he started out trying to write one of his adventure tales and blundered into a farce. Alas, I also fear this wasn't really intended as satire either. It's his skill in writing that gets it as far as two stars. He's not quite at Heinlein levels of making you want to keep reading, no matter what nonsense the author is spouting, but he's getting there.

    1. Re: Dickson, I looked over my old articles — he pretty consistently was pretty consistent… Man in the Mailbag was one of my early favorites from him.

      I just didn't like his first Dorsai serial.

  6. This didn't turn out to be one of my favourite issues of Galaxy by some way:

    One of the reasons I am so late sharing this is it took me three attempts to read the Herbert. He can be a great clean interesting writer when he wants to be, and I was happy with the internal monologuing in Dune World, but this is really poorly done. And when you have people in the story pointing out the concept was already being discussed by HG Wells you may already have something which has been done better by other writers.

    Niven I am beginning to suspect is a writer I will not get whilst everyone else applauds him. I feel I am as much a literary reader as I am a science fiction one, so am looking for character, atmosphere and style as well as concepts so he continues to leave me cold.

    Angagok was one that I had appreciation for what it was trying to do but didn't feel it quite succeeded as well as I would like.

    I am not a fan of Dickson in general or this series in particular so I ended up skimming over it.

    What has been going on with Brunner lately? He used to be one of my favourite writers and would pick up issues of If and Analog just to get his stuff. But I think it has been almost two years since he wrote anything above middling for me. He seems to be trying his hand this year at more long form pieces so hopefully one of those can resurrect his former glory.

    Joseph Green was always one of the better writers from Carnell's gang so is nice to see him pop up here as well as in the new management New Worlds. And for me this is probably the best piece of the issue, a smart idea competently put together where it felt like there was some thoughtful consideration put behind the dilemma.

    I don't have much to add on the Lafferty other than his style grates on me even more than most.

    The Sculptor was a reasonable story that didn't really go anywhere. Competent but forgettable.

    Laumer's story was just far too silly for me and walked away with a bad taste in my mouth.

    Not the best start to the year and a long way from it retaining its title as my favourite North American magazine for a third year running. But still a lot of 1965 to go, so hopefully can get some better pieces from Pohl later in the year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *