by Gideon Marcus
Milestones
Galaxy has now finished 15 years of publication, two thirds of it under the tenure of H. L. Gold and the last five years with Fred Pohl as editor. If Analog (ne Astounding) is representative of the Golden Age of Science Fiction, and Fantasy and Science Fiction represents the literary fringes of the genre, then Galaxy is emblematic of Science Fiction's Silver Age.
Now, in the editorial for this month's issue, Pohl notes that Galaxy has evolved with the times and is a different magazine from the one that debuted with an October 1950 cover date.
I'm not sure I agree. The magazine still looks largely the same, there's still a Willy Ley article in the middle, and the contents still feel roughly within the same milieu: a bit "softer" than the nuts and bolts in Analog, a little meatier than the often light fare of F&SF. Certainly nothing so avant-garde as what we're seeing from the "New Wave" mags in the UK.
In any event, Pohl undercuts his own assertion by trumpeting next month's issue, which will feature nothing but alumni from the early days of the magazine. I'm quite looking forward to it, and clearly Pohl is, too.
And after reading this month's issue, boy can I see why…
Recipe for Disaster
by Gray Morrow
Do I Wake or Dream?, by Frank Herbert
The creator of Dune and other lesser titles dominates the current issue: a full 119 pages are devoted to this short novel. I was dreading it last month, and my dread was well-founded. Here's the premise:
A giant sphere of a ship, the Earthling, is headed out of the solar system toward Tau Ceti. On board are six normal human crew, two thousand frozen and dehydrated people, and a thousand embryos. The humans are all genetic duplicates (with full memories, natch) of actual people, and their main job is to tend the ship-controlling disembodied human brains of "defectives" that have been integrated and trained for the task since birth (a la McCaffrey's The Ship who Sang or Niven's recent series starring Eric the Cyborg).
One by one, the three brains go nuts and either commit suicide or have to be shut down. Two of the tending crew are murdered in the process. Now the remaining four have to decide whether to turn back or not. Complicating the decision is the fact that running the ship without a built-in brain is virtually impossible — the ship has been designed to be extremely delicate to handle, even to the point of having artificial crises pop up just to keep the crew on their toes!
Ultimately, the crew decides to thaw a frozen doctor (so they have, you know, one woman in their ranks) and then, together, create an artificial computer brain to run the ship.
And if that's not enough random factors to juggle, it is also noted that the Earthling is the seventh ship to have its brains all give up. So this problem has happened twenty one times (what is it that Einstein is reputed to have said about the definition of madness?) And the last time humanity tried to build a sentient computer, the computer, the installation in which it was developed, indeed the entire island disappeared off the face of the Earth into some other dimension, destination unknown.
Herbert is nothing if not ambitious.
by John Giunta
He is, however, also a lousy writer. I said as much after reading the sprawling, tedious, and humorless Dune World and its second half, Prophet of Dune. One of my readers suggested that Herbert's third-person omniscient perspective, switching viewpoint characters almost every line, accented by (often superfluous) musings in italics was a deliberate stylistic choice to render the telepathic resonance shared by users of the spice melange. But he uses the exact same style in Do I Wake, and there is nothing supernatural in this book.
I also found the overt anti-woman prejudice annoying, with the woman doctor character starting out pumped full of anti-sex drugs to keep her from being too excited all the time (one of the men debates taking some, himself, because he worries he'll be too attracted to the doctor; he decides against it because they reduce intelligence. Fine for her, though.) Even the drawing of the doctor features her tawdrily topless.
Then there is the endless technical jargon that is not only gibberish, but often archaic gibberish: describing the ship's computer's "relays" (as opposed to transistors or microcircuits) is anachronistic for modern times, more so for machines of the future.
So, not only is Do I Wake a distinct displeasure to read, but it also is utterly implausible every step of the way. At the Journey, we attempt to review everything in the genre that gets put to print, but we refuse to do it to the point of mortification. I gave up on page 40, and you should feel no shame if you follow suit.
One star.
Peeping Tommy, by Robert F. Young
Yet another Robert F. Young reworking of a fable. It keeps you engaged until the end, which is typically terrible.
Two stars.
The Galactic Giants, by Willy Ley
The one bright spot in the issue is Ley's competent science article, the majority of which is devoted to giant stars. The rest deals with tape as a medium for data storage.
Interesting stuff. Four stars.
Please State My Business, by Michael Kurland
A traveling salesman from the future ends up in the wrong century. High jinks ensue. Well, given that the story starts with a sexual assault and ends with a whimper, the jinks are rather low.
Two stars.
The Shipwrecked Hotel, by James Blish and Norman L. Knight
by Gray Morrow
Seven hundred years from now, the Earth houses One Trillion Humans in relative comfort. This piece details the unfortunate saga of the "Barrier-hilthon", a beach-ball shaped hotel loosely anchored in the South Pacific. Thanks to some literal bugs in the system, it becomes unmoored, ultimately crashing into an undersea mountain. A rescue follows.
Hotel could have made an excellent novel by Arthur C. Clarke — a cross between A Fall of Moondust and Dolphin Island. As is, it's not only surprisingly amateur, but it's also just sort of lifeless, more plot thumbnail than story.
I was a bit surprised as Hotel's expository style did not feel like James Blish at all (I don't know who Norman L. Knight is). Then I got to the end where it says the story was by James H. Schmitz and Norman L. Knight. I'm not sure whether its Blish or Schmitz, but Schmitz makes a lot more sense. Schmitz is often good, but he's also often not, and in just this sort of way.
Two stars.
Galaxy Bookshelf, by Algis Budrys
I don't normally devote inches to the book columns. Nevertheless, I've given Budrys a long rope since he came on few months ago, and I can now say with certainty that not only is his judgment orthogonal to mine, but his writing is impenetrable, too. This is a pity. I've liked much of the fiction Budrys has written (at least long ago when he was writing consistently), and I used to greatly value Galaxy's book reviews.
All Hope Abandoned
Wow. That was just dreadful. The only faint praise I can damn with is that the Herbert novel was so bad, it meant I didn't have to waste time on 80 pages of the magazine. This is, without a doubt, the most worthless issue in the Galaxy series.
At least the bar to clear for next month is nice and low!
If you need to get the bad taste out of your mouth (and I know I do!) come register for this week's The Journey Show!
We'll be discussing the latest fashion trends of 1965, and we have some amazing guests including the founder of Bésame Cosmetics. Plus, you'll get to see the Young Traveler show off her newest outfits!
Norman L. Knight contributed 10 or so stories to the SF magazines between 1937 and 1950, all but one in ASTOUNDING. He displayed a sophisticated imagination and a complete lack of understanding of what a plot is. His 1940 ASTOUNDING novella "Crisis in Utopia" was reprinted in Martin Greenberg's Gnome Press anthology FIVE SCIENCE FICTION NOVELS; it is pleasant but meandering. His other novella, "Once in a Blue Moon," from FUTURE (no doubt rejected by Campbell), which was reprinted in the January 1960 SCIENCE FICTION STORIES as part of the dying gasp of those two magazines, was just meandering. The background of "The Shipwrecked Hotel" seems to be derived at least in part from CRISIS IN UTOPIA. The story of his that is probably nearest at hand for most readers, if anyone cares, is "Short-Circuited Probability," which was in Groff Conklin's substantial anthology THE BEST OF SCIENCE FICTION.
Correction: Knight's previous SF career was from 1937 to 1942.
After my Edgar Rice Burroughs and L. Frank Baum phase, and before my nose-dive into science fiction. Sometimes I am sad I missed the "Golden Age".
I picked up a full set of Unknown a few years back. I might read them someday.
Galaxy under H.L. Gold felt like a natural path SF was destined to go. Authors who either did not show up or rarely showed up in Astounding appear. While still reading Astounding in the 1950s, it was Galaxy that would rivet me month after month, Bradbury, Pohl, Kornbluth, Blish, Sturgeon ….even stories by new guys like Dick , Sheckley and Vonnegut … some Heinlein and Asimov , that , I guess, John W would not buy. Hard to know what happened , after Pohl was a part of that era.
It's not a good issue. Maybe not quite as bad for me as it was for you, but pretty bad.
I made it all the way through the Herbert. It doesn't really get any better. I had the vague thought that this might be set in the dim past of the Dune stories. There is a reference to "axolotl tanks" which also appear in those stories, and the concerns regarding computer intelligence seem like they could have been the background to the revolt that led to the mentats. Still terrible.
"Peeping Tommy" was typical bad Young. He even gave the whole thing away with the title. At least there wasn't a smarmy love story.
The Ley article was pretty good. But I couldn't help feeling that Asimov would have gotten a couple of articles out of the topic and been a little more interesting in doing so.
I've already forgotten almost everything about the Kurland except for the stupid accent.
"Hotel" (not to be confused with the current best-selling novel) might have been the best story in the issue, which is a very low hurdle this month. Given that Blish has his name on both the cover and the table of contents, I'm inclined to believe he gets the "credit" for this story. I'd put the story not feeling like Blish down to Knight's input.
Not a very good issue at all.
I didn't hate the Herbert as much as you did, although it was pretty bad. The starship project was wildly implausible in many ways, the constant chatter about computers and consciousness was impenetrable, and the ending was outrageous. A low two stars, maybe.
On the other hand, both of the attempts at comedy were very bad. One star for each.
"The Shipwrecked Hotel" was all setting and event. There might as well have not been any characters in it at all. (The guy trying to get the woman to marry him subplot was trivial, at best.) That said, the background was interesting. Maybe a low three stars.
I am definitely with the consensus that this is not a great issue (nor even a particularly good year for Galaxy so far at that):
The Herbert stylistically doesn't work nor does it really go anywhere. I was hoping Pohl might rein him a bit more but I can't help but wonder if Herbert has become a victim of his own success. The Dune serials are so beloved that editors will just trust he knows what he is doing?
I don't like Young at the best of times, and Peeping Tommy is definitely not one of his best.
Kurland was also poor and forgettable.
I have never quite got the hype about Blish. I have seen a lot of people declare he is the most important contemporary American writer of science ficiton, whilst for me he has always just seemed mid-level competent. This seems to be in that territory for me. Fine but not extraordinary,
I am bit tentative about next month's anniversary issue. I feel like they already have If for reproducing SFF from prior decades. I hope this is going to showcase some more mature work from these writers and not just be a tribute to the past. At least I know Pangborn, Simak and Leiber can all still write well.
Don't forget Smith!
Well… we'll have to agree to disagree on that one…
Le gasp! Are you sure we work for the same organization?