by Joe Reid
The Lost Continent is a movie that leaves me feeling unrewarded for the investment of my time towards it. The premise of the movie is interesting, that being that there is a place on Earth that is so dangerous to mankind that no people could survive there. The thought of seeing brave heroes struggle against the odds and monsters of all types to fight for a noble cause, sounds like it might be a good time.
This is where our expectations disappoint us. Sure, the monsters looked like papier-mâché floats on tracks, but I'm a cinematic veteran. I can overlook such minor issues. No, there are three things that would have changed my opinion on this movie, had they been different, three P’s actually. They are, People, Placement, and Purpose. Had just two of those P’s been different, we could have had an endearing movie. Had just one P been different, I would have considered my time spent justified.
– A group of good looking bad people.
Starting off with the people. The anchor to any story is character based. The characters in this story are all awful people. There is not one good person among them. The movie starts off showing an event that occurs at the very end, then it begins in earnest with the introduction of all the characters for the movie’s proper beginning. It’s set on a ship setting off on a voyage on a dark and stormy night. We met the captain and crew and several of the passengers. They are smugglers, embezzlers, thieves, bullies, drunkards, and gamblers. Among this lot I couldn’t find one decent person who might shine as the hero of the story. Hence, I was left with no one person to root for. It might have been acceptable if some characters began reprehensible and later had a change of heart, but that was not the tenor of this cast, where most start as bad people, only to later in the story transform into a slightly different ilk of bad.
– Someone please help this man!
– No thanks. We’ll just watch him die
So, if we start off with bad people, what could be worse? The answer to that is bad people in bad places and the lost continent is a bad place. As our band of miscreants arrive in the bad place we find that the vegetation and wildlife are very intent on killing humans. Just note, the "placement" that I referring to isn't just the setting. What I allude more to is the stationary placement that all of these bad folks adhere to when other are being attacked by monsters and being killed. Whereas a hero might step and try to fight off monsters, our characters stand back and watch, rooted in place. They don’t care enough about other bad people to risk life and limb to help them.
– bad place
– more bad people.
Lastly we come to the topic of Purpose. As our band of malcontents make shore in the bad place they come to learn of the true monsters that exist in the lost continent. When they are revealed, our “heroes” decide to engage in an war with them. The question is, why? The purpose that our characters fulfill in the story is never clear. It is a case of bad people in a bad place doing things for no reason. Had any of the three listed factors been different, we would have had a different movie. A more enjoyable movie. Instead, we are left with a feeling of emptiness as the Lost Continent amounts to a bunch of lost time.
2 stars.
It has just come out over here and I managed to catch it. It is such a strange experience, as nothing in it seems to make much sense or have purpose it almost feels like it is some kind of new wave experiment.
2 stars does seem right to me as well.
Something about all these "lost world" movies tends to be cheap and dreary. "Atlantis the Lost Continent" is George Pal's worst film, a huge disappointment after "The Time Machine."