December 9, 1963 Indifferent to it all (January 1964 IF)


by Gideon Marcus

Picking up the pieces

It's been two weeks since President Kennedy was shot in Dallas, and the country is slowly returning to normal (whatever normal is these days).  Jackie has taken the family out of the White House, President Johnson is advancing the first legislation of his social welfare plan, the "Great Society," and all around the nation, streets, parks, and buildings are being renamed in the slain President's honor.  In fact, Cape Canaveral, launching site for all crewed flights, is being christened "Cape Kennedy."

We're still trying to make sense of the events surrounding Kennedy's death.  Within an hour of the shooting, there were two divergent theories as to who shot the President.  CBS reported on the trail that led to Marine-turned-defector, Lee Harvey Oswald.  NBC, on the other hand, interviewed a woman who saw a shooter on a grassy knoll overlooking Dealey Plaza.  On December 5, the FBI determined that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, did the deed.  Of course, Jack Ruby ensured that Oswald would never speak in his own defense.  The seven member "Warren Commission," headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, has begun a more thorough investigation.  We may never know who shot Kennedy or why.

A eulogy for Kennedy

Yesterday, I appeared at a local venue to present a eulogy for Kennedy and enlighten the audience as to the youthful President's numerous accomplishments.  In the end, we all drank a toast to Jack.  We taped the performance so you can view it even if you couldn't make the event.

Meanwhile, the science fiction magazines continued as if nothing unusual had happened.  This makes sense given the vagaries of production schedules and the need to have work to press months in advance.  Still, it is an eerie feeling to have the world turned upside down and yet see no evidence of turmoil in one's reading material.

Maybe that's a good thing.  One can use stability in crazy times.

In any event, the January 1964 issue of IF, Worlds of Science Fiction was the first sf digest of the new year.  As usual, it contained a mixture of diverting and lousy stories.  Let's take a look:

The January 1964 IF

Three Worlds to Conquer (Part 1 of 2), by Poul Anderson

On the Jovian moon of Ganymede, American colonists warily greet the arrival of the U.S.S. Vega, a battleship out from Earth.  Thanks to a recent civil war in the USA, it is uncertain where the loyalties of the ship's crew lie.  Meanwhile, tens of thousands of miles below, the inhabitants of Jupiter's surface are also preparing for a war of their own.  The common thread to the two stories is the neutrino beam link set up by the human protagonist who makes his home on Jupiter's biggest moon.

It's an interesting set up, but it utterly fails in its execution.  Poul Anderson is the patron saint of unreliability.  On the one hand, he produced some of last year's gratest works, including Let the Spacemen Beware and No Truce with Kings.  On the other, he produced drek like this piece.

Some examples: Anderson likes to wax poetic on technical details.  He spends a full two pages describing what could have been handled with this sentence: "I used a neutrino beam to contact the Jovians; nothing else could penetrate their giant planet's hellish radiation belts or the tens of thousands of thick atmosphere."

Two.  Pages.

Worse, while I applaud Anderson's attempt to depict a Jovian race, he fails in two directions.  Firstly, it's highly doubtful anything could live on the solid surface of Jupiter, if the planet even has one.  If there is a rocky core, its surface gravity must be around 7gs, and the air pressure would be more crushing than the bottom of the Earth's ocean.  Assuming life could stand those conditions, it would have to be something akin to the well-drawn creatures portrayed in Hal Clement's Close to Critical (in the May 1958 Analog).  Instead, Anderson gives us centaurs with quite human characterization and motivation.

The dialogue is stilted.  The writing is uninspired.  And there's enough padding to comfortably sleep on.

One star.  And, oh boy, a whole 'nother part to read in two months.

Mack, by R. J. Butler

Dolphin stories are big right now, from Clarke's People of the Sea to Flipper.  New author, R. J. Butler, gives us another one.  Something about the thwarting of an alien invasion of fish people.  Pleasant enough but it won't stay with you.  A very low three stars.

Personal Monuments, by Theodore Sturgeon

IF's non-fictionalist tells us about six science fiction authors he believes deserve more credit than they get.  He's probably right.  Three stars.

Science-Fantasy Crossword Puzzle, by Jack Sharkey

A welcome feature that is as long as it needs to be (two pages for the game and half a page for the answer).  Three stars.

The Competitors, by Jack B. Lawson

Here is the jewel of the piece.  Humans and androids have evolved in their own directions, each with a stellar sphere of influence.  When humanity comes across an alien race, whose close ties with their own robots make them more than a match for our species, a crotchety old man and a powerful (but subdued) android take on the enemy.

The interactions between human and humanoid robot are priceless and illuminating.  Neither can stand the other, but both see the value in their cooperation.  In the course of their quest, our human protagonist learns the pros and cons of too close integration of humanity and machinery.

Excellent stuff that packs a wallop: Four stars.

The Car Pool, by Frank Banta

Car Pool is a cute little joke in which a gaggle of human petty criminals turns a run-in with the Martian law into a profitable venture for all concerned.  Three stars.

Waterspider, by Philip K. Dick

There is a sub-genre of science fiction known as "fan fiction."  It is written by SF fans (of course) and involves said fans going on wild and fantastic adventures.  Laureled SF author, Philip K. Dick, offers up the fannest of fan fiction in which a pair of folks from the 21st Century employ a time machine to visit a gathering of "pre-cogs" in 1954 to get help with some thorny spaceflight issues.

The gathering is the 1954 World Science Fiction convention in San Francisco, and the pre-cog the Futurians seek is none other than Poul Anderson.  He is kidnapped back to the future, where he runs into mischief before making it back home (with the notes for a story, of course — probably this one).  Along the way, we get an alien's eye view of the various personages who attended SFCon, including A. E. Van Vogt ("so tall, so spiritual"), Ray Bradbury ("a round, pleasant face but his eyes were intense"), and Margaret St. Clair, whom the aliens anachronistically revere for The Scarlet Hexapod, which she hadn't written yet.

It's a bit of silly, self-indulgent fluff saved from banality by the talents of Mr. Dick; I don't know that it merits a quarter of IF's pages.  Three stars.

Summing up

So, yes, it certainly looks like IF will remain steady and true through any crisis.  This means some bad stories, occasional winners, and a lot of filling. 

Things could be worse.




3 thoughts on “December 9, 1963 Indifferent to it all (January 1964 IF)”

  1. The funny thing about "normal" is that when things get disrupted, either everything eventually goes back to the way it was or the new state of things eventually becomes "normal". Which way things fall this time remains to be seen. I hope for the former, but suspect the latter. We are getting close to Heinlein's "Crazy Years." Let's hope he wasn't too prophetic.

    The Anderson was tedious stuff. His last couple outings have reverted to the kind of work he was doing a few years ago when we all wondered what had happened to his talent. In fact, this seems to be something of a sequel to "Sam Hall" from 1953, which is around the start of his downturn. The politics are deeply unpleasant (there are times I think he falls somewhere between Nixon and the Birchers). As for his Jovian centaurs, they're highly improbable, but maybe they're only a few centimeters high. We haven't really seen anything yet to say they aren't. (OK, I don't actually believe that, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now.)

    "Mack" started well, but was a bit confused at the end. A low three is a very good estimation.

    Sturgeon's list of underappreciated authors isn't bad and he makes a case for each of them. I definitely agree with him about Algis Budrys, though I often find myself liking his work less than I think I ought. Nevil Shute, I just don't see as a SF author. "On the Beach" and "No Highway" are a rather small part of his work. One could generously (and frankly including "No Highway" is already generous) add "Ordeal" and "Round the Bend". Pangborn and Tenn are spot on. I don't really know anything about Vercors, And Tom Godwin is fairly minor in my estimation. "Cold Equations" is one of those stories that seems quite good until you look at it too hard.

    I didn't do the crossword. Mostly because I've grown accustomed to British style crosswords which are a good deal harder than American and require a very different way of thinking.

    "The Competitors" is where we differ the most, I think. I found it dull for the most part. Not terrible for a first story (and I guess better than "Mack", which is also a first), but it didn't really engage me.

    Not even with the help of your review could I remember what "Car Pool" was about. I dug out my copy and looked at it, but only vague details returned. That's not a stellar recommendation. All of Banta's stuff has been weak to middling and this just continues the trend.

    "Waterspider" was an amusing conceit. But not much more than that.

    Not the worst magazine this month (that falls to Amazing; poor John), but not terribly good either.

  2. "Mack" was so-so.  It read like what it was; the first work of a new author.

    "The Competitors" was pretty good.  The robot character was convincingly done.

    "Car Pool" was a typical silly comedy.

    "Waterspider" was, of course, just one big in-joke, but decently done for what it was.

  3. > Cape Canaveral, launching site for all crewed flights, is being christened “Cape Kennedy.”

    Supposedly already being referred to as "Cape Kennedygrad" by many of the ground crew and some of the astronauts.  The knee-jerk renaming of places to honor politicians is a Soviet conceit we don't need to adopt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *