[April 22, 1965] Cracker Jack issue (May 1965 Fantasy and Science Fiction)


by Gideon Marcus

A surprise at the bottom

I'm sure everyone's familiar with America's snack, as ubiquitous at ball games as beer and hotdogs.  As caramel corn goes, it's pretty mediocre stuff, though once you start eating, you find you can't stop.  And the real incentive is the prize waiting for you at the bottom of the box.  Will it be a ring?  A toy or a little game?  Maybe a baseball card.

This month, like most months recently, The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction is kind of like a box of Cracker Jacks.  But the prize at the end of the May 1965 issue is worth the chore of getting there.

A handful of corn


by Mel Hunter

Mr. Hunter continues to make beautiful covers that have nothing to do with the interior contents.  Also, his spaceships look like something out of the early 1950s.  With so many real spaceships to draw inspiration from, it's sad that our rocketships still look derived from the V2.

The Earth Merchants, by Norman Kagan

As early as 1963, folks have been complaining about the space program.  In Kagan's latest work, there is a tight conspiracy to topple NASA through a comprehensive propaganda campaign.  On the eve of the launch of the Behemoth, the first commercially profitable spaceship, the media is filled with advertisements like this:

Dear Elder Citizen;

Hungry?  Too bad that your social security allotment is so small, but just think, six months ago an astronaut circled Mars.  He had a steak dinner the night before he blasted off–

And

Billions for the moon, because the work will have byproducts for medical research?  Why not billions for medical research–it's just as likely to have byproducts for space flight!

The inevitable result is that when things go wrong at launch time, the NASA engineers throw up their hands and let disaster occur.  The viewpoint character, a psychologist who initially leads the project with vigor ends the story with a migraine and a profound sense of guilt.

There are a lot of problems with this story, from its plodding, heavy-handedness to its utter implausibility, not to mention the casual male-chauvinism.  I'm not sure if it's being deliberately provocative to inspire support of the space program or if it's just being satirical for satire's sake.  Either way, its effectiveness is compromised by its inept execution.

Two stars.


by Gahan Wilson

The powers at F&SF have replaced the Feghoot puns with Wilson's art.  God help me, but I think I preferred Feghoot.

Romance in an Eleventh-Century Recharging Station, by Robert F. Young

The Master of Maudlin returns with a sci-fi spin on the Sleeping Beauty story.  Young is a great writer, but his Fractured Fairy Tales are always the least of his works.

I suspect John Boston would give this a one and Victoria Silverwolf a three.  I'll split the difference.  Two stars.

Mammoths and Mastodons, by L. Sprague de Camp

I'm not sure why F&SF included an article on extinct members of Family Elephantidae, but it suffers greatly for being in a magazine that eschews pictures.  It would have been far better suited to, say, Analog.

Three stars, I guess.

The Gritsch System, by Robin Scott Wilson

How to keep a dozen scientists disciplined long enough to put together an engineering project in space?  Give them a distasteful thirteenth teammate to be their scapegoat and whipping boy.

I really disliked the message of this one ("the best way to unite a team is a common enemy") and the one-note story didn't need nineteen pages to tell it.

On the other hand, at least it was actually science fiction taking place in space.  So, two stars.

Short Cut, by Deborah Crawford

Newcomer Deborah Crawford offers an odd poem about the lack of art appreciation in a computerized world.  It lacks much rhyme or meter, but I appreciated the joke at the end. 

Three stars.

Books, by Judith Merril

I normally don't include mention of F&SF's book column.  I just found it noteworthy as it appears Ms. Merril is now the regular reviewer (this magazine is a good home for her given her more progressive predilections), and two of the books she reviews have been reviewed here (Andromeda Breakthrough by Fred Hoyle and The Alien Way, by Gordy Dickson).

Sonny, by Robert L. Fish

SAC base gets a spiffy replacement for its IBM computer.  Between its alcohol-based coolant and a couple of prankster scientists, it proves less than a success.

If I never see a sentient computer gag story again, it'll be too soon.  I would like an author to appreciate that 1) computers will never be sentient, and 2) if they ever do obtain a kind of consciousness, it will in no way mimic that of humans.

One star.

To Tell a Chemist, by Isaac Asimov

In this month's (second) non-fiction article, The Good Doctor expounds on moles, the chemical kind, and the origin of Avogadro's number.  I found this article more disjointed than most, and it felt like, if I hadn't know most of the stuff already, I wouldn't have made much sense of it.

Three stars.

The Prize

No Different Flesh, by Zenna Henderson

Ah, but the last quarter of the magazine is sublime, passing the bedtime test (i.e. if I'm supposed to be asleep but I will not turn out the light until I finish a story, it's gotta be good).

This is a The People story, featuring an ordinary Terran couple with highly relatable sorrows.  They take in a seemingly abandoned child with extraordinary powers, a merciful act that is repaid in the most satisfying of ways.

The Journey's esteemed editor has a maxim: "Good writing is the art of making small things matter."  Zenna Henderson is a good writer.  One of the best.

Five stars.

Aftertaste

Cracker Jack really isn't that good, is it?  But that prize, though!  So even though the magazine scores just 2.7 stars overall, it might be worth picking up a copy for the Henderson.

On the other hand, since there's already been one anthology of People stories, there probably will be another.  In which case, you might well wait until then.  Better a box of prizes than a box of Cracker Jack!



Our last two Journey shows were a gas!  You can watch the kinescope reruns here).  You don't want to miss the next episode, April 25 at 1PM PDT featuring flautist Acacia Weber as the special musical guest.





6 thoughts on “[April 22, 1965] Cracker Jack issue (May 1965 Fantasy and Science Fiction)”

  1. I don't know what Kagan was getting at either. I think there was something about competition for limited government resources, but then why have what seems to be a government agency doing all of this weird stuff to change public opinion? At least the "protagonist" felt vaguely bad about what he was doing.

    Gahan Wilson can be rather hit or miss. He tends to aim for a sort of Charles Addams sense of humor without the same level of art. He's definitely not working for you, if you'd rather have a Feghoot. I found it mildly amusing, but probably would rather have had a Feghoot, too.

    I'm pretty much with you on the Young. He avoided being overly maudlin for once, but the whole thing was so obvious it was painful.

    The de Camp article was interesting, but yes, without pictures, it definitely suffers. I generally enjoy his non-fiction, though this was a bit flat. Maybe it was the subject matter, maybe he needs book length to real get into a subject.

    "The Gritsch System" was pretty bad. Decent writing, but the concept made no sense. In an environment like that, any conflict, even if it's all focused on one non-essential person, could easily get everyone killed.

    "Sonny" was pretty bad. You could see where it was going from a mile off.

    Dr. A's article wasn't bad, though he did drag in rather a lot of minutiae. He's usually interesting, but I don't think I'd want to be in his classroom (Hal Clement, on the other hand…)

    Oh, the Henderson. Instant classic! This may be her best story of the People ever. I wouldn't be surprised if it becomes the story everyone will point readers to when getting them started on this series. Grand stuff.

    1. Here's a question — does the Henderson need the other The People stories?  Part of the joy of this one is the reappearance of some familiar faces.

      Of course, I started the series about halfway in (my subscription to F&SF didn't come until 1956 — it was random newsstand catches before then) and I was hooked anyway.  It's kind of like Cordwainer Smith: all of the stories weave a skein of the universe, but each is self-contained.

      1. I don't think it's necessary. I've read many of the stories, but can't say I retain much from one to the next. This was still absolutely wonderful.

  2. F&SF continues to be as frustrating a magazine as ever. It will occasionally do one piece fantastic enough to just keep me subscribing whilst being rather bored the rest of the time. I was hoping it was finally improving but I am considering having it go the way of IF and Analog and pick up any stories worth reading in the end of year best-ofs from Merill or Carr and Wollheim.

    As here I didn't rate highly anything except the Henderson. But I wouldn't want to have miss out on it as well. Bah!

    Guess I will see how the next few issues pan out.

    I could have sworn there was an announcement in New Worlds Merrill was going to be providing them with reviews of the American market soon. Did that get stopped, will it be a reprint or did I imagine the whole thing?

  3. It must just be me, but I actually thought the Kagan was the best story in the issue.  (Not to say anything against Zenna Henderson.) I'll admit that "The Mathenauts" went over my head, but with this story and "Four Brands of Impossible" I think the author is really stretching the limits of the genre, and taking it in new directions.

    Pretty much general agreement on the other stories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *