[July 14, 1965] The New Dispensation (August 1965 Amazing)


by John Boston

Continuity and Change

Yeah, yeah, I know that’s the most boring headline since the last time Hubert Humphrey made a speech.  But that’s what everybody (well, somebody) wants to know: how is the new Amazing different, or not, from the old one?

Some things we already knew.  It’s still digest size, now bimonthly, with 32 more pages for a total of 162.  On the cover there is a piece of retro-continuity; the new regime has dropped the old title logo for the older title logo, the one used from October 1960 to December 1963, with very minor variations—an improvement, to my taste.  There’s a fairly generic cover by Alex Schomburg (I am certain the departed editor Lalli had a closet full of these) portraying, as you see, a guy in a loincloth brandishing a spear at a giant computer: Progress vs. Savagery, or Regimentation vs. Natural Freedom, as you prefer.  It is said on the contents page to illustrate Keith Laumer’s Time Bomb.  It does not.  There are a number of interior illustrations.  Coming Next Month has not returned.


by Alex Schomburg

And on the contents page . . . oh no.  The blazing insignia of continuity are . . . Ensign De Ruyter and Robert F. Young.  Forty-six pages of Robert F. Young.  Well, let us keep an open mind; here, brace it with this two-by-four.  Anyway, it’s a mistake to infer too much from this month’s fiction contents, since the new management will likely be burning off the inherited Ziff-Davis inventory for some months.

The non-fiction includes another of Robert Silverberg’s articles on scientific hoaxes, and Silverberg’s book review column—good signs if they are signs, but they too may just be what Lalli left behind.  Ironically, the review column is devoted entirely to reprints, ranging from Wells to Sturgeon.  There is also an editorial, in which Sol Cohen—listed on the contents page as Editor and Publisher—first demonstrates that he can be just as boring as his predecessor in editorializing Norman Lobsenz, and then offers a lame explanation of his plans regularly to publish reprints from old issues of the magazine. 

As for the reprints themselves, Cohen has gone for big names, with early short stories from Isaac Asimov and Ray Bradbury: respectively, The Weapon Too Dreadful To Use from the May 1939 issue, and Final Victim (with Henry Hasse), from February 1946.  Each is accompanied by an unsigned introduction, shorter and less bombastic than those by Sam Moskowitz for the “SF Classic” selections of the Ziff-Davis years.  The original illustrations are reprinted along with the stories.

Time Bomb, by Keith Laumer

Keith Laumer’s novelet Time Bomb begins with Yondor, the son of the chief, going over the mountain to look around.  And he sees—danger!  Wounded on the way back, he makes his way home and reports to the chief that their way of life is at risk and they must act!  But the chief doesn’t want to hear it—hey!  Wake up back there!  If you’re bored, do something useful, like listing all the stories you’ve read that begin with this particular cliche.


by Nodel

Anyway, these primitive characters are the descendants of a human outpost, now menaced by the evil alien Tewk, and Yondor gets away from their attack and into a machine with a transportation system requiring only that he sit in a chair and pull a lever and he’ll be somewhere else.  This is a convenient substitute for a plot, as Yondor blunders his way from place to place before learning enough to get back, rescue his people, and smite the bad guys.  As generic melodrama goes, it’s smooth and clever enough that it might be mildly entertaining, say, if one were stuck in an airport waiting for a late plane.  Two stars.

The City of Brass, by Robert F. Young


by Gray Morrow

On the other hand, remarkably, Robert F. Young’s The City of Brass is actually fairly amusing, and not offensively stupid like most of his other rehashes of myths, legends, testaments, etc.  Billings of Animannikins, Inc., has flown in his time sled back to the days of the Arabian Nights in order to kidnap Scheherazade, here rendered Shahrazad, bring her back to the present so his employers can work up a facsimile for public performance, and then return her to her fate.  But Billings kicks some wires in the sled out of place and they wind up stranded in the age of the Jinn (which proves to be about 100,000 years in the future), not far from the Jinn’s brazen city of the title.

Shahrazad is undaunted.  She doesn’t much like Jinn, and is in possession of a Seal of Solomon (here rendered Suleyman) with which she proposes to force all the Jinn into bottles and seal them up.  Billings considers this a reckless plan, and goes out to reconnoiter, setting in train a ridiculous plot involving ridiculous revelations about the Jinn, their origin, and what has happened to humanity in the intervening millennia.  This actually might have made it into John W. Campbell’s fantasy magazine Unknown if he had run short of material one month.  Young’s familiar sentimentality about beautiful women and the men who are captivated by them threatens to take over, but the story ends quickly enough not to ruin the comic mood.

Three stars.  I’ll put that two-by-four back in the shed.

The Weapon Too Dreadful to Use, by Isaac Asimov


by Julian Krupa

The reprints from Amazing’s past nicely illustrate the problems with reprinting from Amazing’s past.  Asimov’s The Weapon Too Dreadful To Use is his second published story and shows it, with stilted writing, cliched characters and dialogue, and a muddled point.  Humans have occupied Venus and are oppressing the natives, though supposedly racial discrimination and hostility have been eliminated on Earth.  (Not too plausible.) The protagonist and his Venusian friend Antil trek to the ruins of a Venusian city and visit the science museum, which is largely intact, but no one has looked at it in living memory.  (Even less plausible.) In a formerly sealed room, Antil finds the eponymous weapon, which can destroy people’s mental functions at interplanetary distances.  (Plausibility meter breaks.) Venus rebels, Earth sends troops, Venus destroys the minds of a lot of them, Earth backs down and grants independence.  It’s clear there’s a smart guy here trying to figure out how to write stories, but he’s not there yet.  Two stars.

Final Victim, by Ray Bradbury and Henry Hasse


by Hadden

Bradbury and Hasse’s Final Victim is much worse.  It is essentially a Bat Durston—a transplanted Western—about a bad deputy, excuse me, Patrolman, Skeel, who always kills the fugitives he is supposed to apprehend.  His superior Anders knows his excuses are no good but can’t do anything, until Miss Miller, the sister of Skeel’s most recent kill, who has proven to be innocent of the accusation against him, decides to go after Patrolman Skeel.  Anders, noting “the firm line of her chin, the trimness of her space uniform, the hard bold blueness of her eyes which he imagined could easily be soft on less drastic occasions than this,” decides to set her up to ambush Skeel herself out on the plains, I mean asteroids, and take revenge.  But when things get really tough, Miss Miller faints.  I stopped there.  Forget stars.  One mud pie.

The Good Seed, by Arthur Porges

Arthur Porges’s The Good Seed, as mentioned, is another in the series about Ensign De Ruyter.  As usual it has some Earth guys at the mercy of treacherous primitive aliens, and they solve their problem with a scientific gimmick that you might find in the Fun with Science column of a kids’ magazine.  One star.

John Keely’s Perpetual Motion Machine, by Robert Silverberg

Robert Silverberg comes to the rescue in his article about a guy who managed to make a pretty good career out of the perpetual motion con, but ironically might have had a better one developing the means of his fraud in the light of day.  This is by far the best story in the issue, despite the fact that it is apparently true.  Four stars.

Summing Up

Well, that was dismal, wasn’t it?  Except for the Mitigation of Robert F. Young (can someone make a ballad out of that?) and Silverberg’s matter-of-fact competence at storytelling and -finding, nothing to see here, move on, move on.



[Come join us at Portal 55, Galactic Journey's real-time lounge! Talk about your favorite SFF, chat with the Traveler and co., relax, sit a spell…]




4 thoughts on “[July 14, 1965] The New Dispensation (August 1965 Amazing)”

  1. I have to confess I was at least relieved to see that it wasn't all reprints or all reprints except for one new story. Pity about the new stories we did get. But as you say, the real question is what happens once Ross and Cohen burn through Cele's leftovers.

    Laumer has really been off his game of late. I think the last halfway decent thing we've seen from him was the second Brion Bayard novel. You know what would have made "Time Bomb" an actually interesting story? If the humans and Tewks really were at peace, with nothing nefarious going on, and Yondor and his people were like those Japanese soldiers that keep turning up, still fighting the War long after it's over.

    "City of Brass" was too darn long. In a really unusual change of pace, I'm going to view this much more harshly than John did. It was much too long, and Billings is such a bumbling idiot, it's hard to like him.

    The reprints were, well, about what you'd expect from relatively new authors in that time period, even if they did get better. Of course, you can find most of those criticisms of Asimov still being applied to his more recent fiction efforts.  About the only really positive thing that can be said is that they were still better (and shorter!) than the reprints we tended to get a few years ago.

    Ensign de Ruyter continues to be bad Arthur Porges, which is very bad indeed. Good Arthur Porges isn't much to write home about. (Hmm, that may be the best argument that he isn't behind the mysterious Arthur Pendragon/Pendragan. Porges is never even that good.)

    Silverberg's article was the highlight of the issue and is probably the best of his scientific hoax articles to date.

    "The Mitigation of Robert F. Young" sounds like something Robert W. Service might have written.

  2. If this is the new format for Amazing, I dread the next issue of the sister publication Fantastic.  More pages + worse Fiction = tedious reading.

    "Time Bomb" was competently written, but this kind of story is very familiar.  The bloodthirsty xenophobia of the protagonist, and the fact that we're supposed to be on his side, was a little unnerving.

    "Final Victim" was pretty bad.  Not a sign of Bradbury's poetic style (whether you like that or not) and a very old-fashioned pulp fiction plot.

    "City of Brass" didn't do much for me.  It relies far too much on the old 1001 Nights stories.  You also have to assume that the people of the far future are stupid enough to fall for the same obvious trick as the Jinn in the old story.

    "The Weapon Too Dreadful to Use" is just juvenalia.  Not a trace of the clean (if not literary) style of the Good Doctor, and his avoidance of melodrama.  Not much happens after the Weapon's effects are described, except what's obvious.

    "The Good Seed" may be the worst of this annoying series.  Not even a decent scientific principle, just "beans swell when they get wet."  (I almost predicted what was going to happen when the "grain" — isn't that different from beans? — was mentioned, but I thought it would be more like the effect of water on rice.  See C. S. Forester's story "Hornblower and the Cargo of Rice" (in the book "Mr. Midshipman Hornblower" for a much better example.)

    1. I am very nervous about Fantastic too. In the first half of the year it has been one of my favourite magazines and if it takes the same decline it will be such a loss.
      On the plus side though, I see the ad in this saying we will get a new Ffhard and the Gray Mouser story and those have always been a highlight of fantastic for me.

  3. My goodness, this is such a sharp drop in quality I am definitely going to be dropping my subscription if it doesn't pick up in the next couple of issues I have left.

    Time Bomb might have been okay filler as a vignette but it is boring and drags on.

    I agree with the consensus that the reprints do not age well. The editorial states how great it is they have such a long history to draw from. I think they are unaware that for most of that history they were considered one of the worst SF magazines on the shelves. It was really a testament to their beloved former editor that she managed to help drag it back to respectability. Also whilst I understand the want to use big names, I feel that it probably won't be long before these will end up being collected somewhere else anyway, given the profusion of Bradbury and Asimov collections. So why not just wait for a paperback release?

    City of Brass also seemed like a very old fashioned 1001 nights silly tale. Didn't work for me at all.

    Never liked the De Ruyter stories and The Good Seed does not change my mind on them at all.

    Am I the only one that is feeling North American science fiction mags are becoming very retrograde right now? Gamma and If both seem to be revelling in the Pulp era, whilst Galaxy also seems to be going backwards. If it wasn't for the recent improvement in F&SF and the excellent work done by book publishers like Ace, I would be tempted to become very parochial and write it off in favour of European work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *