[May 18, 1965] Rubber Ball (or Skip the End) (June 1965 Fantasy & Science Fiction)


by Gideon Marcus

Bouncin' Back to You

Cast your memories back to the distant past — about four years. Remember when Bobby Vee exploded on the scene with his first hit, Rubber Ball.

It's a song about a fellow who should know better than to stick with an untrue love but, like a rubber ball, keeps coming back to her anyhow.  The tune came to my mind more than once as I read this month's Fantasy and Science Fiction, a magazine that has plumbed depths often enough to tempt me to cancel my subscription, but on occasion (like this one) produces such an excellent issue that I remember the good times of the 1950s, and love is rekindled.

Is it the doing of new editor Joe Ferman?  Statistical variation?  Either way, it was a pleasure to read.  Come join me and see why:

Bounce my heart around


by James Roth

Admiralty, by Poul Anderson

We begin with an ending of sorts, the conclusion to the exploits of Gunnar Heim, late of the Federation Navy, now a privateer savaging the Aleriona patch of stars known as The Phoenix.  His goal, to prosecute an undeclared war to liberate the conquered human world of New Europe before its inhabitants run out of Vitamin C, is about to come to fruition.  But how can one ship achieve victory against a starfaring empire?  More personally, will an old flame of Heim's be waiting for him planetside when all is said and done?

Admiralty is Anderson near the top of his form, which, like a sine wave, has definite positive and negative amplitudes.  What makes the piece frustrating is its incompleteness.  This novella and the other two that have recently appeared in F&SF are about to be compiled into a book called The Star Fox, and I strongly suspect that there will be expansions above and beyond what has appeared in the magazines.  Indeed, some of the most exciting episodes in Admiralty, like the capture of the Aleriona prize, Meroeth, are dispatched in a paragraph or two of exposition.  What remains is something of a Readers Digest abridged version — entertaining but dissatisfying.

Also, I wish Anderson wouldn't assume that we all speak French; there are paragraphs and paragraphs of the stuff that go largely untranslated.  I'm going to start sending him letters in Japanese…

Anyway, four stars, for this and the whole sequence, and I suspect the book will be even better.  Certainly Hugo material.

Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, by Fredric Brown and Carl Onspaugh

Dooley Hanks, a clarinetist of modest talent but tremendous desire, scours the world looking (listening?) for The Sound.  When he finds it, in an obscure town in Germany, the temptation to claim it for his own becomes overpowering…and hazardous.

A powerful story, evocative and beautifully told, it's the kind of reworked fable Robert F. Young wishes he could write.

Five stars.


by Gahan Wilson — better than his previous ones

Books, by Judith Merril

Normally, I don't give inches to the book column, but Ms. Merril is cutting and insightful in a way I can only hope to approximate. Don't miss her take on the latest SF to cross her desk (many of which have been covered by the Journey).

Rake, by Ron Goulart

Ben Jolson, shape-changing agent of the Chameleon Corps, is back for another adventure.  This time, in the guise of a student, he's investigating the development of a super-weapon by an academic ensconced at a public college.

This tale is far more obviously slapstick than his previous one, which I had quite liked.  Rake is just too silly, too random to be very good, and there's no reason for such a short piece to begin in medias res followed by a flashback to How It All Began.

Two stars.

Phoenix (the Science Springboard), by Theodore L. Thomas

Normally, Thomas' non-fiction vignettes, more story seed than article, aren't worth the two pages they're printed on.  This time, I quite liked his postulation that at the center of every gas giant lies a terrestrial core.  I don't know if it's accurate; I don't know how we could verify the accuracy, but it is an exciting idea that the planets of the solar system all started out as roughly similar planetoids that grew atmospheres as time went on.  Only the inner ones lost theirs because it was too warm so close to the Sun.

Of course, it's easy to make models that fit the one set of data we have.

Four stars, anyway.

The Ancient Last, by Herb Lehrman

The first of two reader-submitted stories fulfilling the call for tales involving Univac and Unicorns.  This is the more poetic of the pair.  Interestingly, its poignant ending is somewhat marred by two additional paragraphs; because the offending superfluity occurs on a following page, I didn't originally see them, and I thought the ending was stronger than it ended up being.

Funny enough, I was recently rejected by F&SF, whose editor suggested I trim out my terminal line to give the ending more punch.  I did.  We'll see how it does.

Stand-In, by Greg Benford

Another first from a fellow San Diego native.  This Univac/Unicorn story is more swinging and fun, but not particularly consequential.

I give three stars to both.  I'm glad the authors got their breaks and I hope this sets them on their way to stardom.

Story of a Curse, by Doris Pitkin Buck

Earth spacers are forever restless in search of change, intolerant of stagnation.  But when Earth, itself, has changed, the astronauts see the folly of their wanderlust.

Long on emotion, short on coherence, Story is more prose-poem than science fiction.  I liked it well enough, though.  Three stars.

Nabonidus, by L. Sprague de Camp

Archaeologist meets a ghostly colleague of ancient vintage.  This poem has a strange meter, but again, it's appealing.  Three stars.

Future? Tense!, by Isaac Asimov

In a surprise disappointment, the science column is probably my least favorite piece of the issue.  The Good Doctor begins by relating how on-the-spot he feels when asked to predict the future, then says he'll do it anyway, and then doesn't really do it at all.

At a recent bookstore interview, I was asked if a science fiction story's value is based on its predictive accuracy.  I felt that the answer I gave ("No — its value is in how well it entertains; science fiction can't predict the future; it can only extrapolate current trends.") was better and more succinct than the one Dr. A offers.

Two stars.

Of Time and the Yan, by Roger Zelazny

The Last Man of Earth meets the Last Man of Mars; unfortunately, time is not on the side of humanity.

Zelazny increasingly makes his stories more affectedly "literate."  It may get his stories sold, but it's getting tedious.  Two stars.  (Your hue and cry tells me I'm a too-harsh boor.  I do not disagree.)

Jabez O'Brien and Davy Jones' Locker, by Robert Arthur

Lastly, here is the tale of a young New England fisherman who seeks to win fame, fortune, wisdom and happiness through the capture of a mermaid.  Instead, he winds up…well, best not to spoil this gem of a story.

It's an absolutely charming work, the best I've seen from Mr. Arthur, and made all the better for my imagining it being narrated by Fractured Fairy Tale's Edward Everett Horton (now you'll have his voice in your head, too!)

Five stars.

My heartstrings, they just snap

In the end, even this issue bounces around like a rubber ball, but the pages of quality far outnumber the momentary lapses.  The June 1965 issue of F&SF is a stand-out…and my love is rekindled.

Don't break my heart, Joe!



Don't forget to register for our show on May 23 at 1PM DT!  We really want to see you there and hear your questions.





https://event.webinarjam.com/register/34/3q3prsl6

8 thoughts on “[May 18, 1965] Rubber Ball (or Skip the End) (June 1965 Fantasy & Science Fiction)”

  1. The Anderson was very good, though abbreviated. The small print at the end did say that it would be expanded in the novel. My biggest complaint, aside from all the French, is that I saw the complication coming from miles off. It will probably be even more obvious in novel form, when the events of the first segment are even more firmly in the reader's mind.

    Thanks to close familiarity with the geography in question, I also saw where "Eine Kleine Nachtmusik" was going from pretty far off. It was still quite good, though maybe not a full five stars.

    "Rake" wasn't bad. I think I may have more tolerance for Goulart in zany mode than you do. This was still nowhere near as good as "Chameleon" though.

    You skipped Ted Thomas's Springboard. Not that I blame you. This was one of his better ones (a very low bar to clear), but he didn't take it where I thought he was going.

    Of the two UNIVAC and unicorn stories, I think I preferred the Benford. The Lehrman was more poetic, but Benford more to my tastes. I was a little disappointed that both took UNIVAC and unicorn quite literally, rather than simply bringing science and myth together. But since she judged the tales, I suppose that's what Mrs. Buck was looking for.

    Speaking of Mrs. Buck, her story was very poetic. A nice piece though.

    I have no ear for meter and cannot tell a long foot from a short. Nevertheless, I suspect Sprague was trying to emulate Percy Shelley's "Ozymandias".

    Dr. A's article was awful. It had nothing to do with science. It looks to me like he was pressed for time and simply adapted one of those talks he claims he hates to give. You don't like having a room full of people hanging on your every word? Pull the other one, Isaac, it's got bells on.

    It's good for authors to experiment and try different modes and voices. Though I have no great love for deliberately literary work in general, I like literary Zelazny. In my opinion, he usually pulls it off. In this case, riffing (as the jazzmen say) on one of the most famous openings in science fiction is a very bold move. And again, he pulled it off.

    Robert Arthur goes back to the pulp days, though you'd never be able to tell it from this wonderful story. This is another one that has to have Robert F. Young eating his heart out.

    1. I got Ozymandias vibes, too, though the ghost was more of a kindred spirit than a ironic joke.

      Thank you for pointing out the Thomas — I'd meant to include it and forgot.  It's there now.

      We disagree on so little, but Zelazny's piece… feh.

  2. Yes I have the same feeling on F&SF, even if our opinions vary on which ones are the best, it is irritatingly inconsistent but then will put out some amazing piece of fiction and can't give it up.

    The previous Gunar installments I thought were just fine. Not amazing but readable, which is usually the best I get with Anderson. And I felt this was much the same. Still makes it better than most novellas published over the last couple of years so I don't want to knock it too much.

    Brown has been one of those great atmospheric writers for some time and continues to do so here. I wouldn't quite give it a full five stars myself but definitely a solid 4.
    As an aside, I was thinking recently, it is interesting how it seems that many of those who found fame writing for Astounding in the early 40s are either retired or producing less renowned work (Simak being a noteable exception), whilst many of those who started out more predominantly writing for Unknown seem to still be going strong. I wonder why that is?

    I didn't like Chameleon much and I didn't like Rake either. I think Goulart can be good when he is on the more serious side but his comedy always falls flat for me.

    Of the Univac\Unicorn stories I think I feel the Lehrman was better written but the Benford had more meat to it (if also more problems). Neither them are mindblowing but I am always in favour of more writers getting into these magazines and hopefully we will be seeing more from each one.

    The Buck was also beautifully written, just wish it had amounted to more.

    I am up and down on Zelazny but this was one of his I definitely liked. Short, clever and evocative for me.

    And the Robert Arthur was wonderful. What I used to come to F&SF looking for but haven't seen in a long while.

    I have been trying to look back for the last issue of F&SF I liked this much. I think it was probably either the Feburary 1961 issue (which was the start of Hothouse series and a good Rosel George Brown), or the all-star March 1959 issue (which had All You Zombies and a great People story in it). Either way, way back in Robert Mills era.

    1. Oh yes — the first Hothouse and Of All Possible Worlds, which we included in Rediscovery, it was so good.

      And it looks like I enjoyed March 1959 as well — Henderson, Heinlein, and Anderson were the standouts, it seems.

      Those were heady days, weren't they?

      1. Yes indeed they were!

        I know Mills is mostly working as an agent right now but given he did the excellent "Worlds of Science Fiction" collection a couple of years ago, maybe someone can talk to him into following Carnell's lead and doing original anthologies? He so clearly had a great eye for quality storytelling.

  3. The cover is by James Roth … I met Roth … he is a technical illustrator , interesting guy, he does not plan to do covers for long, needs steady work…. I like the cover.

    Boy Anderson… he feels like the ultimate fulfillment of John W Campbell quest for space opera 10 levels above Doc Smith. (Even if Campbell has now gotten tired of the quest.) Sweet levels of verisimilitude , I love this stuff even tho I think there are writers doing even better SF right now.

    Ah … Judith Merril … indeed her reviews are some of the best in any of the magazines right now.

  4. General agreement with the crowd that Poul Anderson is the best at space opera yarns right now.  This novella (or 1/3 of a novel) was the best story in the issue, I thought.  Not to take anything away from the other stories, but I wasn't in love with them as much as others were.

    I didn't care for the Goulart, and I have very mixed feelings about the Zelazny.  All the other fiction in the issue got a "not bad" from me.  (Sorry, but I didn't think the Brown collaboration or the Arthur were truly outstanding.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *