[March 12, 1963] TOO MUCH TO ASK? (the April 1963 Amazing)


by John Boston

So: another not-very-good issue, this April Amazing, where the outstanding item is a piece of well-turned yard goods.  So what’s the reasonable expectation here?  Let’s not be too greedy.  How about at least something in each issue that’s unusually good, and nothing that’s unusually stupid?  Is that too much to ask?  Seems like it is, certainly this month.

“It didn’t happen twice a year that Gustavus Robert Fry, Chief Commissioner of the Interstellar Police Authority, allotted more than an hour in his working day to any one appointment.” That’s the opening line of James H. Schmitz’s Beacon to Elsewhere.  Am I the only one who’s gotten tired of stories that begin by announcing what a big shot—interstellar police commissioner, President, Galactic Coordinator, or what have you—one of the characters is? 

Transitory irritations aside, Beacon to Elsewhere—at 64 pages labelled a “novel”—is a reasonably agreeable piece of hokum, involving the discovery of a new series of elements, compounded into Ymir 400, which has many interesting and dangerous properties including emitting a new sort of radiation.  Two 34-kilogram cases of Ym-400 have been stolen from a space ship in transit.  The story starts with 10 pages of talk, with Howard Camhorn, the Overgovernment’s Coordinator of Research, explaining all of this and more to Chief Commissioner Fry.  This is followed by about 45 pages of the gumshoeing adventures of the more plebeian Lieutenant Frank Dowland, on the case in western North America, investigating the activities of some subversive ranchers who may be trying to use the stolen Ym-400 and may or may not be achieving time travel. 

Some large and daunting aliens make cameo appearances, their gravitas unfortunately impaired by the cover depiction which makes one of them look a bit like an oversized Shmoo (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo).  And the story fades out with another nine pages of talk, first Dowland’s debriefing, and then Camhorn and one of his guys talking about the debriefing.  And here is Schmitz’s unusual talent: he renders all this talk in such genial and readable style that he gets away with a way of constructing stories that would get anybody else a quick rejection letter.  I described the last Schmitz story in this magazine as “just capably rearranging the usual SF furniture”; that will do for this one too.  Three stars.

Schmitz’s competent piece of product is accompanied by a suite of fairly lackluster, or worse, short stories.  Roger Zelazny’s Circe Has Her Problems is not metaphorical; Circe has set up shop on a stray asteroid floating loose in interstellar space, hoping for some male company that can withstand her signature talent of turning them into animals.  An android shows up.  It’s as cartoony as it sounds.  Two stars, fewer in the hands of a less lively writer.  Now that Zelazny has broken in, are we getting his earlier practice pieces?

In David Bunch’s Somebody Up There Hates Us, an alien walks into a bar (actually, a night club on New Year’s Eve—and it walks into all of them at the same time, by the clock anyway) and hands out little wish-fulfillment devices, asking only that the patrons wait until midnight to operate them.  Things are not of course what they seem, and humanity (most of it anyway) is saved only because the bartenders are robots and we have time zones.  There is a smattering of ostentatious futuristic jargon (the protagonist is drinking an old fashioned space squeezings) in what is said to be 1972, but otherwise the writing is fairly mundane, unlike Bunch’s Moderan stories, which at least have the virtue of surface novelty.  There is a recurring theme of the mutual dislike between the protagonist and his wife, which is apparently supposed to be funny but is distasteful.  One star.

J.F. Bone’s For Service Rendered is a deal-with-the-Devil story, the Devil having come through Enid Twilley’s malfunctioning TV set, no pentagram needed.  He doesn’t want her soul, he wants her body, and he’s offering to cure the pancreatic cancer she didn’t know she had and give her another ten years or so free before whisking her off to Hel (sic), which he wants her to know isn’t half as bad as it’s cracked up to be.  This is all laid out in reasonably amusing detail, and then concludes in a stupid male-chauvinistic joke.  Another one-star job.

Harrison Denmark’s [a pseudonym if I've ever seen one…(Ed.)] The Stainless Steel Leech is about a werebot, who’s gotten free from Central Control but, to live (so to speak), needs to get his batteries charged by draining other robots, so he’s also a vampbot (my term, not the author’s) and an object of terror among the other robots (humans having disappeared from the scene).  This mildly clever joke is less annoying than but somewhat similar in tone to Circe Has Her Problems, not too surprisingly since rumor has it that Mr. Denmark is actually Zelazny.  Two stars, clutching futilely for a third.

Frank Tinsley is back after a six months’ absence with The Cosmic Wrecker, a more fanciful exercise than his usual; nobody else seems to be proposing a specialized vehicle to tool around and collect all the burnt-out and abandoned satellites and other assorted hardware we’re going to be leaving in near space.  It’s the usual slightly humdrum rendition, but three stars for originality, never mind that SF writers have been there before—see James White’s Deadly Litter, in New Worlds not long ago (US and UK editions).


And Sam Moskowitz, this time, profiles Lester del Rey, with the usual intense focus on his earliest work, and very spotty coverage of his post-1950 work.  (It’s not just me.  One of the readers’ letters this months calls Moskowitz out for “the manner in which they progress in pertinent detail up to about the mid and late ‘forties and then hastily run a bee-line to the nearby closing sentences.  There is hardly any mention of the author’s latter-day achievements.”)

There’s also a concluding psychological diagnosis that seems incoherent and nonsensical to me.  Del Rey has “never learned the lesson of self-discipline”—a guy who has maintained a very high level of free-lance professional productivity of several kinds for the last decade-plus.  Or: “His facade of toughness would seem to be fabricated more to maintain his own self-estimation than as a defense against the world.  Nevertheless its manifestation in his writing represents a psychological conflict that dams up the release of a reservoir of compassion.”

Huh?  What’s he talking about?  Del Rey has always seemed to me one of SF’s more compassionate writers; take a look at the stories in his Ballantine collection of a few years ago, Robots and Changelings.  Moskowitz seems almost laughably off base here, though as usual there’s interesting biographical information here that you won’t find elsewhere (but adding it all up I’m not sure how much of it to believe).  Anyway, two stars.

So, another waste of time for the most part.  Is there hope?  Maybe.  They are touting Leigh Brackett for next month.  If we’re lucky, she’s still better than her husband (fellow SFF-writer Edmond Hamilton).

[P.S. If you registered for WorldCon this year, please consider nominating Galactic Journey for the "Best Fanzine" Hugo.  Your ballot should have arrived by now…]




4 thoughts on “[March 12, 1963] TOO MUCH TO ASK? (the April 1963 Amazing)”

  1. General agreement here. Schmitz just wasn't really up to the story he came up with. Somebody like Keith Laumer could have turned this into a really good yarn that doesn't just peter out at the end.

    Roger Zelazny got off to such a terrific start, but his output of late has been well below the standard he initially set. Like John, I hope he's just emptying out his files to meet the demands of his editors for more stories while he writes more things like he initially presented us.

    The Bunch tale was… well, it was words arranged in a moderately readable form on the page. I can't say I liked it or hated it. I do know I'm not much of a Bunch fan.

    Bone is usually better than this story. Actually, it moves along all right most of the way, but the pay-off is terrible.

    When a story called "The Stainless Steel Leech" purports to come from the pen of one "Harrison Denmark", I expect a fairly broad farce and parody of "The Stainless Steel Rat". This was neither farce nor parody. This was a general disappointment.

    The fact article was mildly interesting, and while SF writers may have already spotted a potential problem with all that space debris, it doesn't hurt to have a fact article to note that the problem is real. Alas, I think Mr. Tinsley is a bit too optimistic about the ease with which said debris can be collected. Orbital mechanics are a lot more complicated than he makes out, for one thing. But it is good for people to start thinking about this.

    The Del Rey profile left me scratching my head. I'm not sure how much, if any, of that biography we're supposed to believe. In general, the profiles seem to be a lot of filler, but they might have some utility in the future, when people want to know more about those long ago writers of the last century.

    So, yes, another mediocre issue. At least there was no reprint.

    1. As for space debris, I postulate that someday in the future there will be a discipline called "space archaeology" that will track all of these launched and abandoned satellites and spare parts that are starting to orbit the earth.

  2. Agreed, this was all quite disappointing. There have been a run of issues now where the contents page has looked really promising, only to then fail to deliver. As Demetrios points out, though, at least we have lost the reprints.

    I think pretty much everything this month was two stars. That included the Schmitz. The central section was fine but the final section, explaining what had happened in the action sequence just lost my interest. Even the Finlay illustrations were disappointing.

    All the other stories had interesting elements, but didn't quite work for one reason or another. I thought the Bunch was OK, but I know that I'm part of that small minority that Cele Goldsmith seems determined to continue to cater for.

    I haven't given up yet. We are due a good month soon.

  3. Well, this was a dreary little issue.  I found the lead novella tedious, and the short stories trivial.  I would be hard pressed to pick the best out of a poor lot, but I suppose "The Stainless Steel Leech" wins by a nose.  The fact that "For Service Rendered" is nothing but a dirty joke extended to intolerable length makes it the worst, I think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *