I've been watching a lot of television, lately. It's embarrassing. I should be reading more books or doing more than cursorily scanning the front page of the newspaper. Instead, after work I flip on the set and vegetate for an hour. I hope this doesn't become a habit!
It's certainly not as if TV has gotten significantly better. Mr. Ed, My Sister Eileen, the umpteenth season of the Jack Benny Show, none of these are going to win any awards. On the other hand, The Twilight Zone has already won an award (an Emmy last year), and I'm hoping that my continued watching and review of that show excuses my overindulgence in the others.
What did we see last month? First off, there was Back There. Corrigian, a youngish historian, departs for home from his Gentleman's Club after a rousing discussion on time travel. One step outside the Club, and he finds himself in April 1865 on the eve of Lincoln's shooting. Of course, he tries to avert the tragedy, but only one fellow, a sympathetic policeman believes him. Then Corrigan is waylaid by none other than the assassin, John Wilkes Booth. The President is slain, despite the policeman's herculean efforts to warn him, and the professor returns to a seemingly unchanged present. Or is it? The servant who saw Corrigan out is now a wealthy businessman. It turns out he's the great grandson of the policeman from the past, whose attempts to save Lincoln won him acclaim. The lesson: the river of time doesn't like to make drastic changes of course, but it can meander a little. Not bad. Not great. Three stars.
Second up, we have yet another of the hard-to-watch videotape episodes, The Whole Truth. The gimmick for this one was spoiled in the prior week's preview and in the opening of the episode: a crook of a used car salesman buys a haunted Model A, the purchase of which compels the new owner to always tell the truth. This proves fatal to the fellow's business until he hatches a plan to sell the vehicle to none other than Nikita Khruschev. It's an episode that relies on the charisma (or convincing lack thereof) of the main character. Jack Carson does a pretty good job. Three stars.
I looked forward to Invaders; Richard Matheson did the screenplay, and it was billed as a masterpiece of lines-less drama. Something must have happened between the writer's pen and the screen because watching 22 turgid minutes of a farm woman menaced by a pair of miniature Michelin Men was excruciating. My first instinct is to put a good portion of the blame on the actress, Agnes Morehead. There was enough ham in her silent performance to poison a dozen shuls. On the other hand, it might be the director's fault. I heard through the grapevine that Matheson was not happy with the final product—he'd written in twice the action, and the alien invaders (who turn out to be human astronauts in a world of giants) had their screen time kept to a minimum in his version. That would have been nice; they did not bear being in full view very well. My daughter spent much of the show groaning in agonized boredom, pounding the floor. I'm lucky the cops didn't come to take me away for bad parenting. One star.
Thankfully, the follow-up show was a lot of fun. Dick York plays a harried banker who gains the ability to read minds for a day. He figures out what's going on with refreshing haste and uses the gift to great advantage, preventing a potential robbery, halting a bad loan, and getting the girl (who was too shy to verbalize her interest). The scene where he listens in on the thoughts of a vacant-eyed bank patron who turns out not to be thinking about anything is a nice touch. Four stars.
Not a bad run, and good enough to keep us watching on Fridays. Are you tuning in, too?
Thank you for sharing. I like the sound of the first. Though if I'd watched it I bet I'd have really been disappointed – for a little – at Corrigan's failure. I think it might make a better book than a television programme.
#2. I'd think the salesman's assistant would have remembered the truth. Maybe the head salesman found himself cleaned shortly afterward.
#3. Poor Junior Traveller! A disappointment for both of you. Minty probably spent the session grumbling that a real farm would have had a cat who could have settled the trouble quickly.
Hope you found the good ones worth the bad. We're certainly enjoying the reviews.
Once again, a fair amount of agreement. "Invaders" didn't work for me at all either – I can see how this should've been interesting, but it simply didn't come together. I'm not sure who to blame there, really.
Like you, I enjoyed "The Whole Truth," I think a little more than you did. The "let's sell it to Khruschev" ending really sold it to me – I thought that was a riot. It's one of the few times I looked at a Twilight Zone episode and thought, "If only!" But even so, would've been better without that awful "videotape" look. I'd give it a four stars if it hadn't had that strange glare throughout.
And then there's Dick York, of course. I like him. I hope he gets a regular comedy series at some point – he's got a lanky physical energy that I think would work well.
But to your question – I'm certainly not a television addict. I still listen to the radio more than I watch the television. But it's rather funny that you used that particular cover of T.V. Guide as an illustration, since while Peter Gunn it isn't our genre, it is a particularly good piece of series work. I enjoy almost every episode, and – particularly given the current meagre offerings – I'm hoping it has more life left in it.
So right now, it's mostly Twilight Zone, Peter Gunn, and The Andy Griffith Show for me. We're really in a period of doldrums in this young medium – I'm sorely missing Gracie Allen at the moment. Donna Reed is nice enough, I suppose, but certainly no substitute.
I didn't have an ulterior motive when I included the TV Guide cover–it happens to be the one I just got!
Well, right now I'm 8 years old, so it all seems brilliant to me. And I don't get to stay up late enough to watch something scary like Twilight Zone anyway! ;-)
You need a Pop like the Traveler!
A mixed bag, to be sure. Unless the river of time meanders more than the Mississippi, I'm pretty sure that Corrigan found himself in 1865, but otherwise an amusing, though largely forgettable episode. The haunted car was an interesting idea, but the horrible video tape format just detracts too much from all but the most engaging stories. Invaders certainly had potential. I think it would work better on paper, though. On TV you either have to greatly reduce the on-screen time of the title characters or give the game away too soon. And the last story was amusing, at least.
I tell myself I don't watch all that much television. After all, the schedule is dominated by formulaic comedies and formulaic westerns. But then I look at my actual viewing habits, and goodness that's a lot. Of the former, I rather like the Dick van Dyke Show and of the latter Bonanza is always fun (but what happened to Adam?). And if you can manage to stay up late on a Monday night, Boris Karloff's Thriller is often worth watching. I can't always stay awake that long, but the episodes I've seen were good.
Thanks for the tip!
I'm still enjoying The Flintstones. But I wish they'd just cancel that "Six O'Clock News" show, which is just depressing.
Hmmm. I'll agree that the time travel thing and the used car thing weren't that great, and that the penny thing was cute and cleverly done (I'll have to watch out for new writer George Clayton Johnson's work) but I actually enjoyed "The Invaders" pretty well. Maybe the gimmick appealed to me. After all, television should be something other than radio with pictures.