[February 26, 1966] Such promise (March 1966 Analog)


by Gideon Marcus

Tuckered out

Imagine training your whole life to run in the Olympics.  Imagine making it and competing in the quadrennial event, representing your nation before the entire world.  Imagine making perfect strides, outdistancing your competitors, sailing far out in front…and then stumbling.

Defeat at the moment of victory.


Ron Clarke of Australia, favored to win 1964's 10,000 meter race, is blown past at the last minute by American Billy Mills (and aced by Tunisia's Mohammed Gammoudi )

Every month, as a science fiction magazine reviewer, I am treated to a similar drama.  Usually, the law of averages dictates that no month will be particularly better or worse than any other.  But occasionally, there is a mirabilis month, or perhaps things are really getting better across the entire genre.  Either way, as magazine after magazine got their review, it became clear that March 1966 was going to be a very good month.  Not a single magazine was without at least one 4 or 5 star story — even the normally staid Science Fantasy turned in a stellar performance under the new name, Impulse.

It all came down to this month's Analog.  If it were superb, as it was last month, then we'd have a clean sweep across eight periodicals.  If it flopped, as it often does, the streak would be broken.

As it turns out, neither eventuality quite came to pass.  Indeed, the March 1966 Analog is sort of a microcosm of the month itself — starting out with a bang and faltering before the finish.

Frontloaded


by John Schoenherr

Bookworm, Run!, by Vernor Vinge


by John Schoenherr

Norman Simmonds is on the lam.  Brilliant, resourceful, and inspired by his pulp and SF heroes, he breaks out of a top security research facility in Michigan, his mind full of inadvertently espied government secrets.  His goal is to make the Canadian border before he can be punished for his accidental indiscretion. Thus ensues an exciting cat and mouse chase toward the border.

Did I mention that Norman is a chimpanzee?

With the aid of surgery and a link to the nation's most sophisticated computer, Norman is not only smarter than the average human, he has all of the world's facts at his beck and call.  His only limitation (aside from standing out in a crowd) is that he can only get so far from his master mainframe before the link is strained to breaking.  The pivotal question, then, is whether Canada lies inside or beyond that range.

Bookworm is a compelling story whose main fault comes (in keeping with this month's trend) near the end, when we leave Norman's viewpoint and instead are treated to a few pages' moralizing about why such technology must never be allowed to be used by humanity lest one person gain virtual godhood.  I have to wonder if that coda was always in the tale or if it was added by Campbell at the last minute to make less subtle the themes of the story.

Anyway, four stars for Vinge's first American sale (and second overall).  I look forward to what he has to offer next.

The Ship Who Mourned, by Anne McCaffrey


by Kelly Freas

Speaking of intelligence in unusual forms, The Ship Who Mourned is the sequel to the quite good The Ship Who Sang, starring a woman raised nearly from birth as a brain with a shapeship body.  In that first story, her companion/passenger/driver, Jennan, died, leaving Helva-the-ship distraught.

But with no time to grieve.  Her next assignment comes almost immediately: take Theoda, a doctor, to a faraway world so that she might treat the aftereffects of a plague that has left thousands completely immobile, trapped in their nonresponsive bodies.  Though Helva is initially frosty toward Theoda, they bond over their own griefs, and together, they manage to bring hope to the plague-blasted planet.

This is a good story.  I'm surprised to see it in Analog in part because the series got its start in F&SF, and also because the mag has been something of a stag party for a long long time (even more than its woman-scarce colleagues).  Despite enjoying it a lot, there is a touch of the amateur about it, a certain clunkiness of execution.  McCaffrey may simply be out of practice; it has been five years since her last story, after all.

Nevertheless, I suspect that the cobwebs will come right off if she can get back to writing consistently again.  A high three stars.

Giant Meteor Impact, by J.  E.  Enever

Asteroid impact seems all the rage this month.  Asimov was talking about it in his F&SF column, and Heinlein may soon be talking about it in If.  Enever describes in lurid detail the damage the Earth would suffer from an astroid a "meer" kilometer in width — and why an ocean impact is far, far scarier than one on land.

The author presents the topic with gusto, but a little too much length.  It wavers between fascinating and meandering.  Had we gotten some of the juicy bits included in Asimov's article, that would have made for a stellar (pun intended) piece.

As is, three stars.

Operation Malacca, by Joe Poyer


by Leo Summers

And it is here, at the two thirds mark, that we stumble.

Last we heard from Joe Poyer, he was offering up the turgid technical thriller, Mission "Red Clash".  This time, the premise is a little better: Indonesia has planted a 5 megaton bomb borrowed from the Red Chinese in the Straits of Malacca.  If detonated, it will wipe out the British fleet and pave the way for a takeover of Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines.  Only a washed out cetecean handler and his dolphin companion can save the day. 

Sounds like a high stakes episode of Flipper, doesn't it?

Well, unfortunately, the first ten pages are all a lot of talking, the dolphin-centric middle is utterly characterless, merely a series of events, and then the dolphin is out of the picture the last dull third of the story.

Unlike McCaffrey, my predictions for Joe's writing career are rather pessimistic.  But we'll see…

Two stars.

10:01 A.M., by Alexander Malec


by John Schoenherr

At 10:01 A.M., a couple of joyriding punks cause the hit and run murder of a little girl.  Within the space of an hour, they are swallowed by a floating "fetcher" car, hauled before a detective, thence to a judge, and capital sentence is rendered.

Malec writes as if he was taking a break from technical writing and could not shift gears into fiction writing. Compound that with a lurid presentation that betrays an almost pornographic obsession with the subject matter (both the technological details and the grinding of the gears of justice), and it makes for an unpleasant experience.

Two stars.

Prototaph, by Keith Laumer

And lastly, a vignette which is essentially one-page joke story told in three.  Who is the one man who is uninsurable?  The one whose death is guaranteed.

Except they never explain why his death is guaranteed.

Dumb.  One star.

Tallying the scores

And so Analog limps across the finish line with a rather dismal 2.6 rating.  Indeed, it is the second worst magazine of the month (although that's partly because most everything else was excellent). To wit:

Ah well.  At the very least, Campbell took some chances with this issue, which I appreciate.  And the first two thirds are good.  There was just a lot riding on the mag this month.  The perils of getting one's hopes up!

As for the statistics, I count 8.5% of this month's new stories as written by women, which is high for recent days.  If you took all of the four and five star stories from this month, you could easily fill three magazines, which is excellent.

Always focus on the positive, right?



The Journey is once again up for a Best Fanzine Hugo nomination — and its founder is up for several other awards as well!  If you've got a Worldcon membership, or if you just want to see what Gideon's done that's Hugo-worthy, please read his Hugo Eligibility article!  Thank you for your continued support.




5 thoughts on “[February 26, 1966] Such promise (March 1966 Analog)”

  1. I will pick this one up later and give my thoughts as I really enjoyed Ship Who Sang and am keen to see a sequel.

    On the high number of women we have seen this month, it definitely feels like we are on an upswing. I wonder if we can thank Irene Boothroyd for that, after she took the editors to task on how male oriented SF was becoming at LonCon? I am certainly noticing in a number of magazines this month and last month there are mentions of plans that came about at LonCon so this may be where things are starting to filter through?

    1. My actual thoughts on this issue:

      Ah Campbell's editorials. He reads like your drunk great uncle ranting at Christmas dinner. Lets just leave it at that.

      Vinge didn't impress me much in his first piece in New Worlds. This is slightly better but I still thought it was just okay. Possibly it reminded me too much of the monkey comedy films of the last decade, or possibly Vinge is destined to be like Niven, a writer others seem to love but I scratch my head as to why.

      Great to see McCaffrey return after her 5 year haitus. Another great piece and I hope we get more in the series. It continues to feel more like an F&SF story than an Analog one, but perhaps that's no bad thing?

      Operation Malacca felt like a cross between a bad spy movie and an episode of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (which is always bad!). Even the ideas aren't that original and it is poorly put together.

      The two final two short pieces I don't have anything to add other than to say they left no impression on me.

  2. Early on in "Bookworm" I kept thinking that Heinlein had done this story better and more concisely in "Jerry Was a Man", but then the nature of the story shifted. I think it could have been a little shorter and the ending definitely needs improvement. Vinge shows skill though and could have a future if he gets a real editor at some point to help his growth.

    Every few pages in the McCaffrey, I would check the cover of the magazine to make sure I was reading Analog. I can only conclude that Campbell failed to understand this was a story about grief and healing and thought it was in the vein of Med Ship or Sector General. Best story in the issue for me.

    The fact article was interesting, though dry at times, and certainly makes a good companion piece for Asimov's article in F&SF. Very good for an Analog article, not quite up to snuff for one intended for a general audience. Also, didn't Analog have a two-part article on this topic last year or maybe in 64?

    You've clearly stated the flaws in the Poyer. Really, this is another case where a good editor could improve the story substantially. Maybe he needed more room to develop things like the cetacean handler's issues with the military. Poyer might have more success if he moves to thrillers like "Ice Station Zebra". He'll never be as good as Alistair MacLean, but the field is full of authors he's already better than.

    "10:01" was awful. Clearly an attempt at a Rick Raphael sort of story and it missed by miles. Kangaroo courts and summary justice sound like a dystopia to me.

    The Laumer was a trifle. I bet he came up with the title first, based on not realizing that the "epi-" in epitaph doesn't mean "after" as you might suspect from "epilogue".

  3. Interesting that the two longest stories are most interesting when they deal with their animal protagonists, and less so when they talk about the people.

    "Bookworm, Run!" was OK, I guess.  I couldn't figure out if it was trying to be a comedy or not.  Not the most plausible premise in the world either.

    "The Ship Who Mourned" is unashamedly emotional, and all the better for that.  Another vote for it as the best story.  (As noted, it's out of place in Analog.  Would it have been published if it came from the pen of a male author?)

    "Operation Malacca" wasn't bad at all when Charlie was the center of attention, but he really isn't present much.  The start is just another James Bond imitation (even mentioning the character by name!) up to and including the irrelevant sexy woman.  The latter part of the plot is just a war story.  And that big hunk of pure math in the middle doesn't help anything.

    I wasn't sure what to think about "10:01 A.M." at all.  Am I supposed to approve of this summary justice getting rid of the careless punk who killed a child?  But what am I supposed to think when the guy who monkeyed with the flying car gets a year on the Moon?  I'm bewildered.

    "Prototaph" depends entirely on the punchline.  Besides everything else, it's pure fantasy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *